Umax coils, 11" widescan vs 12x10 concentric

Sandman

Gold Member
Aug 6, 2005
13,398
3,992
In Michigan now.
Detector(s) used
Excal 1000, Excal II, Sovereign GT, CZ-20, Tiger Shark, Tejon, GTI 1500, Surfmaster Pulse, CZ6a, DFX, AT PRO, Fisher 1235, Surf PI Pro, 1280-X, many more because I enjoy learning them. New Garrett Ca
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Re: Umax coils, 11" widescan vs 12x10 concentric

Someone said a picture is worth a thousand words so here.
 

Attachments

  • Double-D.jpg
    Double-D.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 477
  • Concentric Coils.jpg
    Concentric Coils.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 479
  • Double-D.jpg
    Double-D.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 2,952
  • Concentric Coils.jpg
    Concentric Coils.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 2,926

Big Dig

Jr. Member
Sep 16, 2009
23
0
Re: Umax coils, 11" widescan vs 12x10 concentric

Better discrimintation, depth, sensity, and pinpointing with the concentric.

The widescan is more stable in hot ground. The pics from sandman show a great view of the 'sweet spot' for these coils, side and front view.

robbor said:
Anyone have an opinion on one vs another or vs std 9x8 coil for coins?
 

OP
OP
R

robbor

Full Member
Aug 20, 2005
151
24
Nevada
Detector(s) used
XLT, GM3, GM4b
Re: Umax coils, 11" widescan vs 12x10 concentric

Ive seen a few time said tesoro's not much good for the beach, why? Would a DD be most effective there? thanks Rob
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top