Horse tack?

[Garabaldi]

What do you think? Is the flower associates with England? Looks like a horse tack possible.

[timekiller]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

[Garabaldi]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

Nice one Timekiller!!!
Thank you.

[timekiller]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

Nice one Timekiller!!!
Thank you.

Your welcome,
Take Care,
Pete,

[CRUSADER]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right

[Silver Searcher]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right

On what grounds and why

[CRUSADER]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right

On what grounds and why

On the same grounds you like to argue

I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hell

Sorry,
going mental, thought I remembered reading late 18th C, just checked in 3 books & they all agree about 1670-1715, so Gordon was right I was a nobber

I will delete my jumping down your throat


What is interesting is that it either takes the site way back further than the buckle pictured, or its been reused/antique furniture travelling across the sea,,,, interesting

[Silver Searcher]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right

On what grounds and why

On the same grounds you like to argue

I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hell

Sorry,
going mental, thought I remembered reading late 18th C, just checked in 3 books & they all agree about 1670-1715, so Gordon was right I was a nobber

I will delete my jumping down your throat


What is interesting is that it either takes the site way back further than the buckle pictured, or its been reused/antique furniture travelling across the sea,,,, interesting

[Garabaldi]

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ukdfddata/sho...=24649&cat=105
Take Care,
Pete,

disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right

On what grounds and why

On the same grounds you like to argue

I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hell

Sorry,
going mental, thought I remembered reading late 18th C, just checked in 3 books & they all agree about 1670-1715, so Gordon was right I was a nobber

I will delete my jumping down your throat


What is interesting is that it either takes the site way back further than the buckle pictured, or its been reused/antique furniture travelling across the sea,,,, interesting

I was thinking the same thing Crusader? I found it at a cellar hole in the woods, so maybe the colonial guy lived a really really long time.