S.E.K. Metal Detecting and Magnet Fishing has a Facebook Page. Brian Stewart is an administrator, and Kelly Noeller have both posted many times on searches around the area. https://www.facebook.com/groups/648863448636307/members
I never quite wrapped my head around the "We'll dig in the same spot a previous searcher DIDN'T find anything..." What is that saying about doing the same thing, and expecting different results?
So much is wrong with your post. For one thing, there IS no "spot" on earth that corresponds to the position of any star regardless of the date, since the earth rotates, and the stars appear to move from east to west, constantly, just as the sun does. The only way that would be possible would...
Since there is just as much "evidence" of there being a "massive treasure" on Oak Island as there is there being one in my back yard, perhaps I can arrange with the Laginas to start a 10-season contract (paid in advance, of course) about the "Curse of Dave's Back Yard" after Oak Island is milked...
There are those that cling to the very LACK of any credible evidence is, in fact, "proof" of a coverup, or conspiracy. "If we can't prove it, it must have been intentionally hidden. Only we enlightened ones can uncover it"
I fail to see ANY logic in being so intent on finding "previous searchers'" holes...they came up dry, so obviously NOT "the spot"...so why re-dig them? Oh yeah, the old "they stooped too soon" theory?
Just to straighten out one particular bit of conjecture that makes me cringe every time I hear/read it:
The lead cross Drayton found a couple years ago is repeatedly referred to as being "incredibly old", or "from the 14th Century". RUBBISH. All that was FACTUALLY determined was that it likely...
My own opinion on that is that there are TONS more (pun intended) credible evidence of a treasure at Victorio peak than a treasure at Oak Island. At least with Victorio Peak, we have photographs, official US Government documents, and MULTIPLE eyewitness descriptions of actually seeing a...
...but it DOES throw even MORE suspicion that the information is false. Given Wilkins' reputation, accepting any of his writings as "evidence" would be like accepting investment advice from Bernie Madoff...
I like the show, because it is so entertaining watching so many without a clue fumbling and bumbling about. The only thing I can think of offhand as interesting (or productive) involves giving a monkey a football.
My wife gets those calls at least 20 times a day, sometimes another comes in as soon as she hangs up, from a different number and a different voice. This has been going on for over two years now. You can't block the number, because the call comes from a different number every time - even MY OWN...
The "3-Legged" 1937D nickel is missing the lower part of the buffalo's right front leg , or the "front" one. Your picture appears to show the buffalo's left front leg missing. It is hard to tell about the back of the Indian's neck in your photo...in an authentic 3-Legger, the back of the neck...
All that is needed now is some proof that Templars were the ONLY ones who planted these trees anywhere. Perhaps an 18th-Century trickster who was fixated on Templar Myths and Legends?
I found it amusing, that after the metal object was analyzed to have a microscopic bit of rose gold with it, that the narrator Robert Clotworthy henceforth referred to the artifact as "the gold object".
It is generally believed the "Egyptians in the Grand Canyon" article was originally written by Joseph Mulhatton, the "Baron von Munchausen of America", or someone imitating his style. Much of the phrasing and descriptions are similar to other stories Mulhatton had written previously.