Cerulean
Sr. Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 2
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
I ask this question not to get exact grades, nor about specific coins, but simply to learn the art, skill and finesse of coin grading.
In the domain of coin grading, which counts more... blunt damage or design weardown?
As an example... you are asked to grade two coins of the same type and variety. Coin A shows heavy design weardown. Lettering has worn down into the coin edge, reeding is nearly smooth, and it's obvious this one's been circulated for a long time. Obviously nothing to write home about here.
Coin B is in far better condition, with sharper design detail, distinct lettering, and less edge wear. However, when you set the coin down on the counter, you notice that it is bent. It won't lay flat, and even wobbles slightly from you setting it down. Upon closer inspection, you notice a major ding on the coin edge, probably resulting from the impact that bent the coin.
Which coin would you grade higher? Exhausted pocket piece Coin A, or the bent but beautiful Coin B?
In the domain of coin grading, which counts more... blunt damage or design weardown?
As an example... you are asked to grade two coins of the same type and variety. Coin A shows heavy design weardown. Lettering has worn down into the coin edge, reeding is nearly smooth, and it's obvious this one's been circulated for a long time. Obviously nothing to write home about here.
Coin B is in far better condition, with sharper design detail, distinct lettering, and less edge wear. However, when you set the coin down on the counter, you notice that it is bent. It won't lay flat, and even wobbles slightly from you setting it down. Upon closer inspection, you notice a major ding on the coin edge, probably resulting from the impact that bent the coin.
Which coin would you grade higher? Exhausted pocket piece Coin A, or the bent but beautiful Coin B?