JMD Site

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
The word "Intangibles" is clearly defined in only one location within the "State of Oregon" code and would not hurt to take a look at it / thing.
 

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
After the year of 1921 the phrase "Resident of the state of Oregon" is only defined in one location within the "State of Oregon" code. Go check it out.
 

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
One key word or phrase you refer to is fraud.

This word is only defined in one location within "The State of Oregon" code. This word is interchangeable and is known as "Fraud or misrepresentation" go check it out.
 
Last edited:

winners58

Bronze Member
Apr 4, 2013
1,727
4,052
Oregon
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I've read many court cases, pleadings, IBLA cases, petitions for redress,
not once has it taken reading 10 pages to find out what it was about.
while that's true as long as no one has claimed the land you can go back to working it,
Congress has added requirements under FLPMA. I have read everything, IBLA's, county filings, ect...
you're missing a 2015 labor filing but went back to work on the claim as per 1872 mining law,
but since the FLPMA requirement cannot be met, you just have to relocate the claim.
I just think you are making it harder than it really is, way over thinking things,
I agree BLM is nefarious and very passive aggressive, take a step back and start over.
come to an agreement to get your property back,
even if it means sucking up and tell them what they want to hear. change the game,
cross the t's dot the i's once its registered by the Federal requirements then you can
assert your rights to maintain the mine roads, and a new fight begins that you can win.
play chess not checkers, offense not defence make them challenge you, have the burden of proof.
 

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Any updates?
Did you look up any of the phrases and words yet?
Thanks.
 
OP
M.E.G.

M.E.G.

Sr. Member
Apr 25, 2014
487
869
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #26
Looks like the bonds or insurance, I've been tracking down for proper utility, may be the only remaining way at them being, "monetary damages is "the only realistic avenue" of holding them accountable for abusing their offices and violating the Constitution"

Supreme Court Effectively Grants Absolute Immunity to Federal Cops
https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.c...ely-grants-absolute-immunity-to-federal-cops/

Read the list of the types of official crimes protected:
Rogue Cops: The Supreme Court Is Turning America Into a Constitution-Free Zone
 

russau

Gold Member
May 29, 2005
6,891
6,197
St. Louis, missouri
From what I've seen over the years ,after the USFS has illegally removed another person's property on a Federal Mining claim ,the rightful owner of the claim and property owner will NEVER see his property again . I've seen this happen to a friend of mine from Fl. at a Rally in Oregon years back. The courts bounced him all over the place as with the court times and dates hoping that he would miss the "new" court date and time. BUT my friend showed up ( fortunately ) a day early to thwart their manipulation of dates and times for court ,thinking that he would miss this manipulation of dates because he lived in another state ! He never did get his property back and it's been about 15 years ago. WHAT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE !!!
 

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
From what I've seen over the years ,after the USFS has illegally removed another person's property on a Federal Mining claim ,the rightful owner of the claim and property owner will NEVER see his property again . I've seen this happen to a friend of mine from Fl. at a Rally in Oregon years back. The courts bounced him all over the place as with the court times and dates hoping that he would miss the "new" court date and time. BUT my friend showed up ( fortunately ) a day early to thwart their manipulation of dates and times for court ,thinking that he would miss this manipulation of dates because he lived in another state ! He never did get his property back and it's been about 15 years ago. WHAT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE !!!
Just a starting point for your friend. Start look at Oregon mining "Cases / law" just before and after Oregon was admitted into the Union for some very solid foundation / points.
 
Last edited:

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
By the way around 99.7 percent of these "Cases" still stand and have not been over turned.
 

Assembler

Bronze Member
May 10, 2017
2,136
786
Middle Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
From what I've seen over the years ,after the USFS has illegally removed another person's property on a Federal Mining claim ,the rightful owner of the claim and property owner will NEVER see his property again . I've seen this happen to a friend of mine from Fl. at a Rally in Oregon years back. The courts bounced him all over the place as with the court times and dates hoping that he would miss the "new" court date and time. BUT my friend showed up ( fortunately ) a day early to thwart their manipulation of dates and times for court ,thinking that he would miss this manipulation of dates because he lived in another state ! He never did get his property back and it's been about 15 years ago. WHAT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE !!!
Just asking if the USFS used a certifided geologist in this case?
Did the geologist statement determin the out come of the case?

Do you mind sharing the case number in a PM? Just for reading only. Thanks.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Anderson Detector Shafts

Latest Discussions

Top