Some my stones with test data

Naukoveckiy

Full Member
Mar 13, 2019
131
79
Ukraine
Detector(s) used
ЧингисХан
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

Damn, I can see it normally on the preview. But on the website you display the 9th photo from the 1st photo.
photo with stone 9 refers to the last two spectral measurements

18:46 - I figured out how to organize photos


and today (30.11) I noticed that the 9th stone and the 4th are either the same or the same thing. and it has nickel.
and 6 and 8 were thought to be either copper-based or nickel-based. Neither one nor the other

old topic about these stones with photos etc.:
 

Attachments

  • 5269767771334502840.jpg
    5269767771334502840.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 8
  • 5264764435082372637.jpg
    5264764435082372637.jpg
    84.8 KB · Views: 5
  • 5269767771334502379.jpg
    5269767771334502379.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 6
  • P90806-200647 (1).jpg
    P90806-200647 (1).jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 6
  • 10.jpg
    10.jpg
    117 KB · Views: 4
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    86.1 KB · Views: 4
  • 30.jpg
    30.jpg
    117.2 KB · Views: 4
  • 31.jpg
    31.jpg
    68.6 KB · Views: 4
  • 40.jpg
    40.jpg
    118.6 KB · Views: 6
  • 41.jpg
    41.jpg
    77.3 KB · Views: 6
  • 50.jpg
    50.jpg
    131.3 KB · Views: 5
  • 51.jpg
    51.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 4
  • 60.jpg
    60.jpg
    96.3 KB · Views: 4
  • 61.jpg
    61.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 2
  • 80.jpg
    80.jpg
    100.4 KB · Views: 2
  • 81.jpg
    81.jpg
    66.3 KB · Views: 5
  • 90.jpg
    90.jpg
    107.1 KB · Views: 4
  • 91.jpg
    91.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 4
  • 92.jpg
    92.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos
they look different... they are the same in composition but in different proportions.
considering that the one with the black veins is shaped like a bullet... I'll try to take a photo like that later
 

Attachments

  • 5264764435082372637.jpg
    5264764435082372637.jpg
    84.8 KB · Views: 3
  • 5269767771334502378.jpg
    5269767771334502378.jpg
    94.3 KB · Views: 3
  • 5269767771334502377.jpg
    5269767771334502377.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 3
  • 5269767771334502379.jpg
    5269767771334502379.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 5
  • 0c598fad-4327-46c9-8241-37169bb39ee1.jpg
    0c598fad-4327-46c9-8241-37169bb39ee1.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 4
  • 29059472-c8a3-40a0-88bc-665bc3d65759.jpg
    29059472-c8a3-40a0-88bc-665bc3d65759.jpg
    96.3 KB · Views: 4
  • af1b16c9-e518-4b5d-add1-a1abeb445d76.jpg
    af1b16c9-e518-4b5d-add1-a1abeb445d76.jpg
    100.4 KB · Views: 3
  • b6f04cef-c870-4e46-aaee-e812e771bef9.jpg
    b6f04cef-c870-4e46-aaee-e812e771bef9.jpg
    66.3 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos
I used to think he looked like that Gourara 003

Gourara 003
Classification: HED achondrite (Eucrite, monomict)
History:...
Physical characteristics: Fragments of the single broken stone display an extremely fresh, black glossy fusion crust. Certain fragments display radial flowlines, rollover lip, and regmaglypts. A slice of the interior reveals a brecciated sample with an assortment of light and dark clasts set in a finer-grained matrix.
Petrography: (D. Sheikh, FSU) Specimen is a monomict breccia consisting of eucrite lithic clasts exhibiting primarily diabasic textures (grain size 800 µm, up to 3 mm) set in a fine-grained clastic matrix of similar lithology with approximately 50% pyroxene, 45% plagioclase, 4% opaques, and 1% shock-melt veins. Mineral phases include pigeonite (most displaying exsolution lamellae of varying width; some inverted to orthopyroxene), augite (some exsolved from pigeonite), orthopyroxene, calcic plagioclase (display both polysynthetic and carlsbad twinning under cross-polarized light), ilmenite, chromite (some Ti-rich), and SiO2-rich glass.
Geochemistry: Orthopyroxene (Fs51.5±1.9Wo4.9±0.7, range Fs48.5-55.0Wo3.6-5.7, FeO/MnO = 31±4, n=15), Pigeonite (Fs50.7±1.3Wo7.4±1.2, range Fs47.9-53.3Wo6.1-10.8, FeO/MnO = 32±4, n=26), Augite (Fs27.7±3.4Wo37.7±4.6, range Fs21.3-33.9Wo27.1-42.3, FeO/MnO = 28±4, n=8), Calcic Plagioclase (An91.6±1.2, range An88.7-94.2, n=42).
Classification: HED Achondrite (Eucrite, monomict breccia).
Specimens: ...
 

Attachments

  • 34115f80-2b36-4e4e-90d4-12f47adfa6f9.jpg
    34115f80-2b36-4e4e-90d4-12f47adfa6f9.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 5
  • ac5f7d6d-494c-4f36-b63c-14c688df4e20.jpg
    ac5f7d6d-494c-4f36-b63c-14c688df4e20.jpg
    131.3 KB · Views: 5
  • P90806-200647 (1).jpg
    P90806-200647 (1).jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Hi.. they did an analysis on some of my stones.. below is a photo and a test.
What do you think?

sorry. I don't know how to put it in order..
in general, one set is two photos.. stone and analysis. that is, photos 1 and 2 are the 1st stone. Photos 3 and 4 are the 2nd stone. The last stone has two test photos

Damn, I can see it normally on the preview. But on the website you display the 9th photo from the 1st photo.
photo with stone 9 refers to the last two spectral measurements

18:46 - I figured out how to organize photos


and today (30.11) I noticed that the 9th stone and the 4th are either the same or the same thing. and it has nickel.
and 4 and 6 were thought to be either copper-based or nickel-based. Neither one nor the other
response from our meteoritic institute:
We sincerely thank you for your interest in meteorites and the data you sent, but we have to disappoint you. All the analyses were performed incorrectly, because for such samples it is necessary to do a chemical analysis taking into account oxygen. Therefore, unfortunately, we will not be able to use them for diagnostics.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top