Has Anyone Decrypted Beale???

[bigscoop]

wacouta,

Pick any subject matter you like and then apply what you're doing all over again. In the end you will find suspected results that appear as though they may be relevant to the new subject matter, and yet they are just random results with no relevance to anything whatsoever. The most sophisticated computers and encryption programs in the world have been applied to the ciphers and the results are always the same. You're going to drive yourself nuts trying to figure something out that can only be solved with the correct key and the correct application of that key, "if" in fact there is an actual clear text to be had at all. Computers have built 60 - 75% intelligible and properly written clear text that have included everything from Disney World to individual Super Bowls, and yet they are obviously not connected to the Beale Ciphers in anyway.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[wacouta]

wacouta,

Pick any subject matter you like and then apply what you're doing all over again. In the end you will find suspected results that appear as though they may be relevant to the new subject matter, and yet they are just random results with no relevance to anything whatsoever. The most sophisticated computers and encryption programs in the world have been applied to the ciphers and the results are always the same. You're going to drive yourself nuts trying to figure something out that can only be solved with the correct key and the correct application of that key, "if" in fact there is an actual clear text to be had at all. Computers have built 60 - 75% intelligible and properly written clear text that have included everything from Disney World to individual Super Bowls, and yet they are obviously not connected to the Beale Ciphers in anyway.

I just breathed into a paper bag a couple times Thanks!
In case anyone is wondering, I made a converter for the cipher
start on the number 10 and go forward in 11's
10, 21, 32, 43, 54, 65, 76, 87, 98
109
208
307
etc.
for example if the cipher number was 308, 3 rows of 9 +1 in the 4th row
would be 27+1=28 then 308-28=280 and look up 280 in the DOI which would be an "s" instead of"o"

 

[wacouta]

I just breathed into a paper bag a couple times Thanks!
In case anyone is wondering, I made a converter for the cipher
start on the number 10 and go forward in 11's
10, 21, 32, 43, 54, 65, 76, 87, 98
109
208
307
etc.
for example if the cipher number was 308, 3 rows of 9 +1 in the 4th row
would be 27+1=28 then 308-28=280 and look up 280 in the DOI which would be an "s" instead of"o"

Also, I just figured out that if you did the highest number "2906" (The number of pilasters in Solomon's temple) you would get 264. 2906-264=2642
There happens to be 1322 numbers in the DOI so, if you double it , you could find numbers for those (?)'s I think that would give an "o" for 2642

 

[Cryptography]

I am just curious, has anyone heard of the Beale codes being put through a decryption process using computers and ultra sophisticated computer/data systems?

The Rev has done it back in 2014.

 

[ECS]

...and all he got was an epitaph in broken English that a GRAND FRET!
that turned a whiter shade of pale.

 

[masterpoe]

wacouta,

Pick any subject matter you like and then apply what you're doing all over again. In the end you will find suspected results that appear as though they may be relevant to the new subject matter, and yet they are just random results with no relevance to anything whatsoever. The most sophisticated computers and encryption programs in the world have been applied to the ciphers and the results are always the same. You're going to drive yourself nuts trying to figure something out that can only be solved with the correct key and the correct application of that key, "if" in fact there is an actual clear text to be had at all. Computers have built 60 - 75% intelligible and properly written clear text that have included everything from Disney World to individual Super Bowls, and yet they are obviously not connected to the Beale Ciphers in anyway.

Wow, this guy has a really neg vide on everything!

 

[Cryptography]

Wow, this guy has a really neg vide on everything!

Yes, yes he does. You need to take your computer off autocorrect.

 

[bigscoop]

Yes, yes he does. You need to take your computer off autocorrect.

You need to study the purpose and reason behind ciphers.....actually take your manufactured cipher solution and run a few comparable test. Do this and you'll start to understand why your proposed solution "can't be accurate." Until you do this you'll forever remain within the illusion that you've created for yourself.

 

[Cryptography]

You need to study the purpose and reason behind ciphers.....actually take your manufactured cipher solution and run a few comparable test. Do this and you'll start to understand why your proposed solution "can't be accurate." Until you do this you'll forever remain within the illusion that you've created for yourself.

Again, you have no clue what others have done! You are just posting your opinion! TOO BAD!!!

 

[ECS]

Again, you have no clue what others have done! You are just posting your opinion! TOO BAD!!!

...and you Crypto are posting your opinion that "others" have correctly solved the remaining unsolved Beale ciphers, without posting proof or documentation other than these claims mixed with insults.
That does make an interesting statement by itself.