Two nice Canadian silver dimes!

O-dog

Jr. Member
Feb 21, 2015
22
29
Toronto, ON
Primary Interest:
Other
Searched 10 CWRs today and was rewarded!

1951 and 1937!

DSC_0858.jpg

DSC_0859.jpg

HH

Owen
 

Upvote 0

CW3(ret) US Army

Hero Member
Jun 30, 2011
642
589
Downstate New York
Detector(s) used
White Spectra V3i
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Searched 10 CWRs today and was rewarded!

1951 and 1937!

View attachment 1125392

View attachment 1125398

HH

Owen

:3coins: Nice finds for only 10 cwr. May you find many more. Welcome to TNET & this hobby/obsession/addiction. BTY I found a 1968 silver Canadian quarter. Numista coin identifier says in 68 the Canadian silver quarter was only 50% silver. I thought I had read elsewhere that in 1968, they made both a 50% & 80% silver coins. If that's true how could I be able to tell the difference?
HH
Gary
 

Spartcom5

Hero Member
Feb 2, 2015
808
936
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
:3coins: Nice finds for only 10 cwr. May you find many more. Welcome to TNET & this hobby/obsession/addiction. BTY I found a 1968 silver Canadian quarter. Numista coin identifier says in 68 the Canadian silver quarter was only 50% silver. I thought I had read elsewhere that in 1968, they made both a 50% & 80% silver coins. If that's true how could I be able to tell the difference?
HH
Gary
Maybe a scale. I remember seeing somewhere that's the reason why people just call them 65%ers.
 

fistfulladirt

Gold Member
Feb 21, 2008
12,204
4,918
Great Lakes State
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
dirtfishing
Primary Interest:
Other
:3coins: Nice finds for only 10 cwr. May you find many more. Welcome to TNET & this hobby/obsession/addiction. BTY I found a 1968 silver Canadian quarter. Numista coin identifier says in 68 the Canadian silver quarter was only 50% silver. I thought I had read elsewhere that in 1968, they made both a 50% & 80% silver coins. If that's true how could I be able to tell the difference?
HH
Gary
Gary, there's a chance your 1968 canadian quarter contains no silver, but hope it does - easy test would be magnet check. If it sticks, there's no silver.

The 1967 Canadian dime and quarter were issued in 80% silver/20% copper and 50% silver/50% copper. For 1968 dime and quarter changed to 50% silver/50% copper, then later 99% nickel the same year.

To tell the difference for '67, you need a scale with .01 oz accuracy.
80% silver canadian quarter weighs about 5.83 grams.
50% weighs about 5.05 grams.

When I've sold '67 quarters and dimes in the past, they were always bought at 50% silver value.
 

Last edited:

thurmownator

Bronze Member
Dec 25, 2006
1,892
65
Primary Interest:
Other
The '67 dimes and quarters, either 80% silver or 50%, have the exact same tech specs and weigh exactly the same. There is no known way to differentiate (that I'm aware).

Technical Aspects - Canadian Circulating Coinage

I understand that they way they are treated (from a silver bullion perspective) on the open market, as neither the buyer nor seller can tell, is to treat them as 65% silver (splitting the difference). To do it any other way would be unfair to one of the parties.
 

CW3(ret) US Army

Hero Member
Jun 30, 2011
642
589
Downstate New York
Detector(s) used
White Spectra V3i
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Gary, there's a chance your 1968 canadian quarter contains no silver, but hope it does - easy test would be magnet check. If it sticks, there's no silver.

The 1967 Canadian dime and quarter were issued in 80% silver/20% copper and 50% silver/50% copper. For 1968 dime and quarter changed to 50% silver/50% copper, then later 99% nickel the same year.

To tell the difference for '67, you need a scale with .01 oz accuracy.
80% silver canadian quarter weighs about 5.83 grams.
50% weighs about 5.05 grams.

When I've sold '67 quarters and dimes in the past, they were always bought at 50% silver value.

:3coins: It passed the magnet test no problem. That is the first thing I do to all my 1968 Canadian dimes & quarters.
HH
Gary
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top