Sorry, but I see some chip marks on it from banging other coins even though minor. One can't say it is uncirculated as somebody had to spend it before it made it's way to the bank.
BTW, correct me if you think I'm wrong, but isn't one condition of being a proof is that it isn't touched by man?
I know the descriptions equal to the numerical condition are somewhat of a misnomer. A value of 68 would be classed as uncirculated at least, but it can be proven that a proof coin has to have been circulated in order to get to the bank as they did not get it from the mint. Maybe I'm picking my own nits here.
Swave...just admit you were wrong, accept it with some grace, learn something from it, and move on instead of just digging the hole deeper and deeper. Its a proof. Enough said.
You can call it whatever you like, but my point was that it does go by the numerical scale and won't command a higher price just because you call it a proof. Diver Down confirmed what I was saying along that line. If the proof is damaged to the point it falls below the usual scales for unc and proof then the coin will get a rating below that is according to the numerical condition. This might be AU and it does seem odd to have a coin presented as a proof in AU condition as the proof designation is now worthless IMO. Admittedly, the coin is in nice shape and should carry a high numerical value, but if you were to try to sell it to me as a proof I wouldn't accept that. I would accept it as unc.
You can call it whatever you like, but my point was that it does go by the numerical scale and won't command a higher price just because you call it a proof. Diver Down confirmed what I was saying along that line. If the proof is damaged to the point it falls below the usual scales for unc and proof then the coin will get a rating below that is according to the numerical condition. This might be AU and it does seem odd to have a coin presented as a proof in AU condition as the proof designation is now worthless IMO. Admittedly, the coin is in nice shape and should carry a high numerical value, but if you were to try to sell it to me as a proof I wouldn't accept that. I would accept it as unc.