Is this something special or just plain common? **-PICS-**

K

Full Member
Jul 17, 2011
210
2
MI
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • SAM_2080.JPG
    SAM_2080.JPG
    31.7 KB · Views: 306
  • SAM_2103.JPG
    SAM_2103.JPG
    26.8 KB · Views: 294
  • SAM_2092.JPG
    SAM_2092.JPG
    32.1 KB · Views: 297
  • SAM_2095.JPG
    SAM_2095.JPG
    29.5 KB · Views: 300
  • SAM_2096.JPG
    SAM_2096.JPG
    28.7 KB · Views: 295

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
85,844
59,630
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Sorry I Don't see anything Unusual
 

Diver_Down

Silver Member
Dec 13, 2008
4,373
2,000
St. Augustine, FL
jeff of pa said:
Sorry I Don't see anything Unusual

Jeff, the OP is trying to point out the "filled D" mintmark of the 79 Rosie. He was told in another section of TNet that it is common and carries no additional premium to a collector. It isn't an error rather the overuse of a die smashing dimes and the degradation of the die and "glop" filling voids in the die. Comparing a die from the 70's to one in this millennium is rather pointless as the Mint's engravers periodically retool dies to clean them up and add/accentuate details.
 

FreedomUIC

Bronze Member
Jan 4, 2010
1,974
466
NUNYA
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
1979 Roosevelt Dimes from the San Franciso Mint had two series, Type 1 (Blobbed S) - similar to your Blobbed "D" and the true "S" after they discovered the die was causing problems and created a new one without the Blobbed S (Type II).

Same might hold true for the Denver mint as well. Worth checking into, I wouldn't just pass it off as a grease filled die until I further researched the issue, seems 1979 was a problem year for the Roosevelt dimes and the mints.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top