Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree5Likes
  • 1 Post By OwenT
  • 1 Post By et1955
  • 1 Post By OwenT
  • 2 Post By OreCart

Thread: S.47 - Natural Resources Management Act - Another Land Grab?

« Prev Thread | Next Thread »
  1. #1
    Feb 2015
    Moses Lake WA & Provo UT
    438 times

    S.47 - Natural Resources Management Act - Another Land Grab?

    I just found out about this today. The Natural Resources Management Act. Different media sources portray it from several positive aspects, even advertising that it will actually help some groups with access, but actually looking into it, it just looks like another land grab. They're making more monuments, more national parks, expanding existing ones. Closing all sorts of land to any sort of mineral or otherwise resource exploration. I noticed this because it includes a huge mineral withdrawal (340,000 acres) right on the very borders of the Slate mining district in Washington. Looks like in Utah alone more than 1,000,000 acres will be become "protected". Already passed the US Senate 92-8, now on to the House.
    et1955 likes this.

  2. #2
    Charter Member
    Ed Tracy

    Jan 2015
    Equinox 800
    726 times
    Thanks for the headache Owen
    OwenT likes this.

  3. #3
    Feb 2015
    Moses Lake WA & Provo UT
    438 times
    I wrote Rep Newhouse about it. Clearly, it will still pass but I wanted to let him know that I'm not impressed that he "championed the act" (according to ifiber one news Major public lands act offers protection for Washington resources | Columbia Basin | ifiberone.com) Especially when he states on his website that he believes "Land-use decisions should be made locally, not by far away federal bureaucrats. It is Congress’ duty to ensure that public land management promotes economic development, not burdensome regulations and red tape."

    P.S. I believe this posting, even though "political," is allowed per the rules as it is "directly related to treasure hunting".
    et1955 likes this.

  4. #4
    Jan 2019
    154 times
    OwenT...good for you for contacting your congressman.

    They say here in Maine anyway, a topic is "of interest" when (1) constituent calls a congressman and lets them know how they feel. It takes just (2) phone calls on one topic for it to be considered, "hot". And when there are (3) phone calls, they consider the phone "ringing off the hook," So I always encourage people to present their opinions because people might not realize, they have far more influence than they think.

    Again, good for you.
    OwenT and et1955 like this.



Remove Ads

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Yet another land grab
    By goldenIrishman in forum Gold Prospecting
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: Apr 15, 2016, 08:26 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 18, 2014, 10:41 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Feb 29, 2012, 12:33 PM
  4. SB 657 is in comm, Natural Resources and Water. List of Members
    By Hefty1 in forum Dredging & Hi Banking
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Mar 28, 2011, 09:09 PM
  5. Bottom trawling affecting natural resources...
    By Alexandre in forum Shipwrecks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Oct 28, 2009, 06:54 PM
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.3.0