Ok Skeptics, I will accept the challenge of $25K

[Carl-NC]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

nonsense!

Arch

It's true, Arch... Toto is 20% less confident in failure than you are.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[architecad]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

nonsense!

Arch

It's true, Arch... Toto is 20% less confident in failure than you are.

I don't know Carl but what I see on those guys, they're playing and you're in the middle of the playground catching all balls crossing. They're recommending your challenge with a great motivation and I don't see you backing them up!! wao, good observation!! no?

Arch

 

[EE THr]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

nonsense!

Arch

It's true, Arch... Toto is 20% less confident in failure than you are.

I don't know Carl but what I see on those guys, they're playing and you're in the middle of the playground catching all balls crossing. They're recommending your challenge with a great motivation and I don't see you backing them up!! wao, good observation!! no?

Arch

Arch---

Whatever ever happened to my challenge to you? Remember? I said that if you give me $100K, as good faith money, then I would send you the $10K you wanted for being a professional treasure hunter, and you agreed to then take Carl's test.

So, it's all finalized, then.

P.S. You have better get yourself an LRL or MFD, or you will have to use coat hangers. Maybe you can borrow Art's RangerTell.





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

I already underbid you by $2,000.

--Toto

nonsense!

Arch

It's true, Arch... Toto is 20% less confident in failure than you are.

I don't know Carl but what I see on those guys, they're playing and you're in the middle of the playground catching all balls crossing. They're recommending your challenge with a great motivation and I don't see you backing them up!! wao, good observation!! no?

Arch

Arch---

Whatever ever happened to my challenge to you? Remember? I said that if you give me $100K, as good faith money, then I would send you the $10K you wanted for being a professional treasure hunter, and you agreed to then take Carl's test.

So, it's all finalized, then.

P.S. You have better get yourself an LRL or MFD, or you will have to use coat hangers. Maybe you can borrow Art's RangerTell.





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

 

[architecad]

Hey arch..You can clearly see that the skeptics are in a panic..You and puffdaddy have clearly taken away the only talking point that they had left. ..Art

My friend said"

You can clearly see that the skeptics are in a panic.

I saw it coming!!

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Where is my $10K ?

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Where is my $10K ?

Arch

Arch, pay attention! First you need to send me my $100K. So where is that?

 

[architecad]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Where is my $10K ?

Arch

Arch, pay attention! First you need to send me my $100K. So where is that?

You didn't pay attention to my early post. I won't negotiate out of contract. Pay up front my $10K first.

Need vacation!

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Where is my $10K ?

Arch

Arch, pay attention! First you need to send me my $100K. So where is that?

You didn't pay attention to my early post. I won't negotiate out of contract. Pay up front my $10K first.

Need vacation!

Arch

You never had a contract for any $10K, or anything else. So I'm just playing by your rules.

What's the matter, you don't like your own rules?

Once again, you are being self-contradictory, and are your own best "skeptic."






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

Nonsense!!

Disappointed again!!

Arch

Why are you disappointed?---according to your "logic," I accepted your challenge, so you should be happy!

Once again you have contradicted yourself.

And once again you are your own best "skeptic."







A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Where is my $10K ?

Arch

Arch, pay attention! First you need to send me my $100K. So where is that?

You didn't pay attention to my early post. I won't negotiate out of contract. Pay up front my $10K first.

Need vacation!

Arch

You never had a contract for any $10K, or anything else. So I'm just playing by your rules.

What's the matter, you don't like your own rules?

Once again, you are being self-contradictory, and are your own best "skeptic."






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

I posted the rules in the first post about this challenge or are you blind? No $10K no challenge!! so simple

Next Skeptics,.....................

Arch

 

[EE THr]

I posted the rules in the first post about this challenge or are you blind? No $10K no challenge!! so simple

Next Skeptics,.....................

Arch

Oh, OK, I get it. Now you are saying that if I start a new topic, and explain my conditions for your challenge, then you will owe me $100K.

Thanks, I'll get right on that. You are very generous!

 

[architecad]

I posted the rules in the first post about this challenge or are you blind? No $10K no challenge!! so simple

Next Skeptics,.....................

Arch

Oh, OK, I get it. Now you are saying that if I start a new topic, and explain my conditions for your challenge, then you will owe me $100K.

Thanks, I'll get right on that. You are very generous!

Everybody here caught you already in your many falsehoods. If you said about the use of lemon to test gold, that's your problem. I use Kellyco gold kit but that is not the issue. I'm not emotional but observer about your behavior. Everybody here, in some manner, don't like you because the way you're. I'm honest with you. You're an old man of 65. Make your mind. Keep busy attending your grandchild rather than arguing with user about MFD. California has many reason to re- build its economy. Maybe you can be useful there because your thoughts, ideas, criticism and skepticism are not useful at all in this forum.

Arch

 

[EE THr]

If you think I post falsehoods, then quote one, with proof that it's false.


Like this one of yours---

Everybody here caught you already in your many falsehoods. If you said about the use of lemon to test gold, that's your problem. I use Kellyco gold kit but that is not the issue. I'm not emotional but observer about your behavior. Everybody here, in some manner, don't like you because the way you're. I'm honest with you. You're an old man of 65. Make your mind. Keep busy attending your grandchild rather than arguing with user about MFD. California has many reason to re- build its economy. Maybe you can be useful there because your thoughts, ideas, criticism and skepticism are not useful at all in this forum.

Arch

And once again, you try to make me the topic subject, rather than face reality.

I'm not the topic of this, or any other thread, in this (LRL) section.

You have no need to worry about me. Just the discussion.

You made a statement about something I supposedly said, but your statement was false. And now you can't admit it. So you want to change the subject to attacking me. This isn't my first rodeo, Arch. That won't work. Did you ever consider apologizing for making that false statement? Otherwise, it won't just go away. It stays stuck in front of you, and you will just have to live with it.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Everybody here caught you already in your many falsehoods. If you said about the use of lemon to test gold, that's your problem. I use Kellyco gold kit but that is not the issue. I'm not emotional but observer about your behavior. Everybody here, in some manner, don't like you because the way you're. I'm honest with you. You're an old man of 65. Make your mind. Keep busy attending your grandchild rather than arguing with user about MFD. California has many reason to re- build its economy. Maybe you can be useful there because your thoughts, ideas, criticism and skepticism are not useful at all in this forum.

Arch

Of course you can't post the quote, because there isn't any. You simply made that up.

So, to avoid admitting to your fabrication, you are trying to change the subject over to me.

Sorry, that won't get you out of your spot as an exposed pretender.

Is it also in your constitution that you should make up falshoods? Oh, that's right, I forgot---you are an LRL promoter, so that's just what you do! I shouldn't have needed to ask!



Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[architecad]

If you think I post falsehoods, then quote one, with proof that it's false.


Like this one of yours---

Everybody here caught you already in your many falsehoods. If you said about the use of lemon to test gold, that's your problem. I use Kellyco gold kit but that is not the issue. I'm not emotional but observer about your behavior. Everybody here, in some manner, don't like you because the way you're. I'm honest with you. You're an old man of 65. Make your mind. Keep busy attending your grandchild rather than arguing with user about MFD. California has many reason to re- build its economy. Maybe you can be useful there because your thoughts, ideas, criticism and skepticism are not useful at all in this forum.

Arch

And once again, you try to make me the topic subject, rather than face reality.

I'm not the topic of this, or any other thread, in this (LRL) section.

You have no need to worry about me. Just the discussion.

You made a statement about something I supposedly said, but your statement was false. And now you can't admit it. So you want to change the subject to attacking me. This isn't my first rodeo, Arch. That won't work. Did you ever consider apologizing for making that false statement? Otherwise, it won't just go away. It stays stuck in front of you, and you will just have to live with it.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Everybody here caught you already in your many falsehoods. If you said about the use of lemon to test gold, that's your problem. I use Kellyco gold kit but that is not the issue. I'm not emotional but observer about your behavior. Everybody here, in some manner, don't like you because the way you're. I'm honest with you. You're an old man of 65. Make your mind. Keep busy attending your grandchild rather than arguing with user about MFD. California has many reason to re- build its economy. Maybe you can be useful there because your thoughts, ideas, criticism and skepticism are not useful at all in this forum.

Arch

Of course you can't post the quote, because there isn't any. You simply made that up.

So, to avoid admitting to your fabrication, you are trying to change the subject over to me.

Sorry, that won't get you out of your spot as an exposed pretender.

Is it also in your constitution that you should make up falshoods? Oh, that's right, I forgot---you are an LRL promoter, so that's just what you do! I shouldn't have needed to ask!



Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

You're the proof itself. All BS that you say here are falsehood!! What another proof do you want? Ask any users here if you're right!! We can post here evidence but like I said before, I don't waste my time with people like you.

Arch

 

[aarthrj3811]

Like the head of the skeptic cult says..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html

A Self-Confessed Liar
To be fair, he has never claimed to be anything other than a showman, best expressed by his own remark,
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'
However, those he has maligned find it less amusing and persistent rumours of forthcoming libel cases would seem to be entirely justified. Perhaps more importantly still, the mischief caused by his unsupported explanations can be profound; the effect is to cloud the issues as his 'debunkings' become part of the public lore. It is thus particularly unfortunate that so many top-ranking scientists, desperate to ignore evidence to the extent that they will believe almost anyone who opposes the paranormal, still appear to take his views seriously, quoting his research as if it were really credible.

 

[EE THr]

Like the head of the skeptic cult says..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html

A Self-Confessed Liar
To be fair, he has never claimed to be anything other than a showman, best expressed by his own remark,
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'
However, those he has maligned find it less amusing and persistent rumours of forthcoming libel cases would seem to be entirely justified. Perhaps more importantly still, the mischief caused by his unsupported explanations can be profound; the effect is to cloud the issues as his 'debunkings' become part of the public lore. It is thus particularly unfortunate that so many top-ranking scientists, desperate to ignore evidence to the extent that they will believe almost anyone who opposes the paranormal, still appear to take his views seriously, quoting his research as if it were really credible.

That's it, Art---when in doubt, quote something totally unrelated.

I would guess that your motto is: "If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em."

I think we have all seen it before, and are not impressed.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

Like the head of the skeptic cult says..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html

A Self-Confessed Liar
To be fair, he has never claimed to be anything other than a showman, best expressed by his own remark,
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'
However, those he has maligned find it less amusing and persistent rumours of forthcoming libel cases would seem to be entirely justified. Perhaps more importantly still, the mischief caused by his unsupported explanations can be profound; the effect is to cloud the issues as his 'debunkings' become part of the public lore. It is thus particularly unfortunate that so many top-ranking scientists, desperate to ignore evidence to the extent that they will believe almost anyone who opposes the paranormal, still appear to take his views seriously, quoting his research as if it were really credible.

That's it, Art---when in doubt, quote something totally unrelated.

I would guess that your motto is: "If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em."

I think we have all seen it before, and are not impressed.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Waoo EE was called "Charlatan". In Spanish that is a tough word. No reputation, No credibility, No nothing!!

If I was EE, I would give up this forum!!

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Like the head of the skeptic cult says..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html

A Self-Confessed Liar
To be fair, he has never claimed to be anything other than a showman, best expressed by his own remark,
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'
However, those he has maligned find it less amusing and persistent rumours of forthcoming libel cases would seem to be entirely justified. Perhaps more importantly still, the mischief caused by his unsupported explanations can be profound; the effect is to cloud the issues as his 'debunkings' become part of the public lore. It is thus particularly unfortunate that so many top-ranking scientists, desperate to ignore evidence to the extent that they will believe almost anyone who opposes the paranormal, still appear to take his views seriously, quoting his research as if it were really credible.

That's it, Art---when in doubt, quote something totally unrelated.

I would guess that your motto is: "If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em."

I think we have all seen it before, and are not impressed.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Waoo EE was called "Charlatan". In Spanish that is a tough word. No reputation, No credibility, No nothing!!

If I was EE, I would give up this forum!!

Arch

Thanks for the further proof of #12, in the list below!

Keep up the good work---I'm sure that any newbies who come along will find your recommendations to buy LRLs and MFD....Well....Ah....Amusing!



Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[architecad]

Like the head of the skeptic cult says..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html

A Self-Confessed Liar
To be fair, he has never claimed to be anything other than a showman, best expressed by his own remark,
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'
However, those he has maligned find it less amusing and persistent rumours of forthcoming libel cases would seem to be entirely justified. Perhaps more importantly still, the mischief caused by his unsupported explanations can be profound; the effect is to cloud the issues as his 'debunkings' become part of the public lore. It is thus particularly unfortunate that so many top-ranking scientists, desperate to ignore evidence to the extent that they will believe almost anyone who opposes the paranormal, still appear to take his views seriously, quoting his research as if it were really credible.

That's it, Art---when in doubt, quote something totally unrelated.

I would guess that your motto is: "If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em."

I think we have all seen it before, and are not impressed.






A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

Waoo EE was called "Charlatan". In Spanish that is a tough word. No reputation, No credibility, No nothing!!

If I was EE, I would give up this forum!!

Arch

Thanks for the further proof of #12, in the list below!

Keep up the good work---I'm sure that any newbies who come along will find your recommendations to buy LRLs and MFD....Well....Ah....Amusing!



Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Your welcome doof!!

Arch