signal_line
Silver Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 3,601
- 1,835
- Detector(s) used
- XP Deus
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
xfu
Last edited:
Gee...the box that LRl’s are in would cost more than 5 dollars..If you are dowsing a set of bent coat hangers will work but are no where near the best kind of Rods.
Placebo LRL"Fake LRL" is probably not the right term--"Pretend LRL" is a lot closer because the user has to pretend they are not a disguised dowsing rod. Maybe "Placebo LRL" is more scientific-sounding.
I grew up in Fair Oaks. It was a big deal to get Wolfman Jack on your set. It was not that hard. I played a lot with CB radios and antennas and learned how to get the most out of both. Most of it is just common sense.During my younger years when I wanted to learn something I would go to College. Uncle Sam would pay me to do this. So if you are a GI I think you should consider this. Heck, when I wanted to learn how to weld I went to college. You have an advantage over many students as you already know how to work. You do not have to worry about grades or taking required classes as you are there for one thing only. To learn something that you want to learn.Did some darn good crystal sets when I was a kid, DX'ed the Wolfman from Sac'to despite strong local stations.
I think he said there are over 100 universities who bought a set. If you want to learn about frequency discriminators read up on Meyl. Why do the lines of force (signal line) from the longitudinal waves bundle up at the target?
As far as I know I have not used a device that had a Tesla Coil in it and I know I have never dug a piece of gold that had a receiver in it. I have used devices where I have followed signals to the target and also have used devices where I followed the return signal to the target. Both kinds of signals have been very good for me. You have to understand that Natural Gold has been hiding for millions of years and does not have any modern technologyExperimental- and Demo-Kit
As a result of common demand and frequently asked questions during the breaks and after the recitations of Prof. Dr. Meyl (e.g. how does an energy transmission line work? and what kind of single components have to be used? etc) we decided to develop a demonstration-kit and an experimentation-kit to allow interested practitioners to gain experience and to make experiments by themselves. So with these two kits you are able to research the characteristics of Tesla coils, dependency of the resonant frequency concerning position and size of the ball electrode and varieties of the systems resonance depending on changes of the distance between transmitter and receiver by yourself. The main goal is to achieve reproducible measurements, which cannot be done by a simple instruction guide but otherwise doubters often only believe in results of measurements acquired by their own devices. Therefore connection possibilities for external measuring devices are provided.
Yes that is what you are doing. I tell people how my LRL’s work. It is not very hard to understand. You keep making excuses for not being able to use one using the normal method..ArtYeah, more phony skeptic "logic". "They shall wail and gnash their teeth outside the gates..."
I don't post much of my info just because someone always has to take a dump on it. I rarely read woof's posts because he is on my IGNORE list, but i read one here about the ideas are near field radio engineering technology not superstitious magick. DUH! Actually "Physics" is a more correct term. But no sense trying to convince a skeptic. LOL Biased beyond belief. It's like if I say it, a skeptic immediately assumes I am superstitious. That's why skeptics are not qualified to make any judgements. In other words, stick with your metal detectors. I own a Meyl set of coils and electrodes. I think he said there are over 100 universities who bought a set. If you want to learn about frequency discriminators read up on Meyl. Why do the lines of force (signal line) from the longitudinal waves bundle up at the target?
Wow I am shocked that with 3 different brands FTP puts out, Garrett is top in sales? Garrett does not seem to be on the cutting edge as far as new features & new machines IMO.Yeah, the propaganda tactics have been used to sell metal detectors for as long as I have been detecting (1970's). The Garrett metal detectors have been the top sellers for years now.
FTP is not associated with Garrett.
Garrett is a top seller because they make a solid, working and workable product and advertise to attract the first time buyers. But then they back that up with additional models that satisfy those that do want to move up. Walk through an airport or courthouse and you will notice a LOT of Garrett equipment used in the screening at security points. There is a reason for that. You won't see a policeman waving "L" rods at someone. ;-)
Who thinks FTP is associated with Garrett? I was simply surprised that with all the models FTP produces, Garrett was still top seller. I had never even thought about the commercial side of the industry. As far as consumer/hobby detectors, the Garretts really do not interest me much. The fact that Garrett rules the security wand/commercial security market, does not want to make me rush to buy their metal detectors.
Yes that is the reason why I buy my toolsThe reason they are popular is because they work. People pay money for things that work
Just more misinformationDousing on the other hand relies on nothing but chance... which is why it *sometimes* seems to work and why people who do it claim it works. It works as well as walking around digging holes. Sometimes you find stuff in holes, after all the earth is littered with humans who litter the earth with stuff.
That has been discussed for about 20 years. The question should be....How come no one has been allowed to take the test..Thousands have applied but can not qualify..Why aren't you taking that million dollars? Let the excuses begin.