Artifacts possibly?

Oct 2, 2012
650
413
Detector(s) used
Cabella's
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
DSCN4750.JPG DSCN4753.JPG DSCN4754.JPG DSCN5053.JPG DSCN5054.JPG DSCN5055.JPG DSCN6816.JPG DSCN6817.JPG
 

Upvote 0

islamoradamark

Silver Member
Aug 26, 2016
3,630
3,993
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I see a fishing hook,a shell necklaces ,a fossilized string bean and half of a bikini top from 1,000,000. B.C.
 

unclemac

Gold Member
Oct 12, 2011
7,025
6,926
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
not without knowing any context...
 

Mark Todd

Hero Member
Apr 22, 2014
705
684
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
On a more serious note, the hook shaped item looks like it's made aluminum or some kind of metal, but not copper, if that's the case,most likely not an Indian artifact. If however it's made of bone, ivory, or antler different story.
The (mussel?) shell looks looks to be very old and/or very eroded due to contextual environmental conditions. That being said, the hole in is probably just due to environmental impact. It's possible that the hole was man made, but in my opinion, and even if I had found it, I would highly doubt that the hole was man made.
The other item that you pictured appears to be a tooth, belonging to what, I'm not sure. It shows use wear at the top and where it constricts about two thirds of the way down would be what was below the gum line.
Hope that helps.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top