Paleolithic axe?

Freemindedclark

Sr. Member
Sep 18, 2017
373
669
Elliott Iowa
Detector(s) used
The Hubble telescope
Primary Interest:
Other
I found this in a small creek in southwest Iowa. I was told it is a Neolithic axe made out of basalt. Thought maybe I could get more insight from you. 20170927_072333.jpg 20170927_072153.jpg 20170927_072356.jpg 20170927_072232.jpg
All finds were on private property which I have permission to hunt.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

rock

Gold Member
Aug 25, 2012
14,705
8,917
South
Detector(s) used
Coin Finder
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Welcome to the forum 1st of all. Thats a hard call for me maybe somebody else will chime in Im not from your area and am not up to date on the materials used in your area. Have you thought about washing it?
 

Mark Todd

Hero Member
Apr 22, 2014
705
684
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hey Clark nice find in the creek
It's obviously been partially and purposefully ground and pecked in order to be hafted to a handle
The earliest datable pecking and grinding processes used by Indians begin in the middle Archaic period (approximately 4-5,000 BC), so it's definitely not Paleolithic. "Crudely made" hammerstones and axes is not an indication of age. It could have been made any time during the mid-archaic to the historic period. The term Neolithic is not usually used by archaeologists to point to a particular time period because it can denote vastly different time periods depending on the context of it's usage, rather it is used to describe a new stone tool technology taking place. The term actually just means a time of new stone technology.
 

Last edited:
OP
OP
F

Freemindedclark

Sr. Member
Sep 18, 2017
373
669
Elliott Iowa
Detector(s) used
The Hubble telescope
Primary Interest:
Other
Thank you for the bit of knowledge. I was referencing what I was told by a paleontologist. He believed it to have been made by a Neanderthal.
 

OP
OP
F

Freemindedclark

Sr. Member
Sep 18, 2017
373
669
Elliott Iowa
Detector(s) used
The Hubble telescope
Primary Interest:
Other
That's what he said. This guy is a retired professor and has been all over the world working for nation geographic.
 

1320

Silver Member
Dec 10, 2004
3,434
2,308
East Central Kentucky
As with all potential artifacts, context with other artifacts is the only way that one can positively and definitively claim such a strong statement. Since it was found in a creek, all we can do is speculate.
 

Mark Todd

Hero Member
Apr 22, 2014
705
684
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Thank you for the bit of knowledge. I was referencing what I was told by a paleontologist. He believed it to have been made by a Neanderthal.

Paleontologists are not Field Archeologists and sometimes are very uninformed about what is well known in field archaeology.
I Will send you some authoritative sources to show you where I got my information from. I am always much more satisfied with sources rather than just assertions.
I am away from home right now working but I will get back to you later.
"Grim" is right, classroom professors often have very little or no actual experience in the field and are more informed with unproven theories and speculations although this is not always the case.
 

Last edited:

Mark Todd

Hero Member
Apr 22, 2014
705
684
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I assume free minded doesn't mean that you think you can believe whatever you want, but that you're free to look at the facts, which is an admirable stance of a critical mind.
Here are just a couple of sources for the information that I asserted earlier... ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576112.343404.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576149.983730.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576176.704125.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576211.650228.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576233.171438.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576288.624817.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576326.299902.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576354.782948.jpg ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576380.129827.jpg
I'd encourage you you to buy a copy of the latter book, you can't go wrong, less than $20 bucks for one of the best introductions to archaeology sold! ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1506576646.430185.jpg
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top