|
-
Aug 20, 2010, 12:42 PM
#1
Interesting take on Oak Island Treasure
http://altnews.blogdig.net/archives/...ECRYPTION.html
Could it have been designed so that these "stones" could be a type of "key"?
-
Aug 20, 2010 12:42 PM
# ADS
-
Oct 14, 2010, 06:44 PM
#2
Re: Interesting take on Oak Island Treasure
I remember reading about this treasure back in 1987 in Time Life magazine along with Atocha. Great story to read when I was a kid. Just seems the deeper you dig the more treacherous it becomes and fills up with water.
-
Oct 02, 2012, 10:13 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by blackbeard1717
I remember reading about this treasure back in 1987 in Time Life magazine along with Atocha. Great story to read when I was a kid. Just seems the deeper you dig the more treacherous it becomes and fills up with water.
I had that issue for years! Probably what was what gave me the Bug
-
Oct 21, 2012, 01:31 AM
#4
-
Oct 22, 2012, 07:53 PM
#5
-
Nov 13, 2012, 10:18 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by Smee
And a hard way to dig up the treasures.
-
Dec 25, 2012, 06:06 PM
#7
Smee; I'm fairly certain that Oak Island was dug out for a powder magazine by the British, a goverment job if you will. It was set up so that in case it fell to the enemy hands,( France), it could be flooded to destroy the Black powder. There were several compartments dug into the bed rock ,so if one exploaded, it wouldn't blow up the whole thing. Modern powder magazines are done the same way. A treasure would not require seperate compartments in bed rock. Anyway who ever did it; it must have been paid for by tax payers, no one else could aford to have done it. I think it hast to be a "G" job. Only some admiral behind a desk could have dreamed up such a thing. Tod R.
-
Dec 29, 2012, 03:26 PM
#8
-
Jan 15, 2013, 11:13 AM
#9
FinderKeeper, first off I have to say I don't know anything. A treasure hunter from Boston sent me info. that discribed seperate compartments at the bottom "dug" out in bed rock. I think this is true, I've got it some where. Anyway it occured to me that this was a powder magazine because of the seperate compartments. I thought there were 3 flood tunnels, am I wrong? Isn't that why the first shaft
flooded? The British Navy could bring the coconut fibers. You've got me on the carbon dateing. My thinking is, the flood tunnels were
dug in case it fell into enemy hands. You are right it could flood acidently and ruin the black powder; that's the crazyness of the whole project and I expect it was never used for that reason. Why fill it in? Maybe to save face----------I filled in a mine shaft, it goes fast.
Like I say, I realy don't know but, it strikes me as a typical goverment boondoggle. Tod R.
-
Jan 16, 2013, 10:17 PM
#10
Your story could be right , who's to say. Everyone has their thoughts on this. They looked for tunnels but never found them and how would anyone be able to dig them back then. There are cracks in the bedrock and when you get below sea leavel the water comes in. The hole was dug and the timber, coconut fibers and charco were found at 90' down above sea leavel . Anything found later was placed there by diggers to get investers to keep digging. There is nothing there. They spent millions and had every kind of detecting equipment on site yet they think its there . I have a site on main land and we plan to have it dug up this spring to see if any thing is there. I may be wrong but I am not looking for treasure on Oak Island. We plan to drill for Gold and Tantalite after we dig at our site.
-
Jan 29, 2013, 03:04 PM
#11
Apparently there has been so many holes dug that they don't even know which one is the original any more....If there was something there surely someone would have found it by now.....you'd think
-
Mar 19, 2013, 04:29 AM
#12
all i can say is that whoever did it could not have been a pirate because they needed engineering skills and i dont think pirates had that
-
Mar 19, 2013, 08:23 AM
#13
 Originally Posted by able_walker
Apparently there has been so many holes dug that they don't even know which one is the original any more....If there was something there surely someone would have found it by now.....you'd think 
The holes drilled is what caused the flooding of the tunnels. There was an entrance between some trees that had a carving of a dagger on it. They found the entrance after the drilling caused the waters to enter the tunnels.
The treasure was placed there in the early 1600's by knight's templar and there it will remain.
-
Mar 20, 2013, 02:08 PM
#14
If people are willing to spend millions of dollars on this then why would this not work? Drill deep over lapping holes round the entire circumference of the original hole. Fill them with cement and you will have a dam to stop the water. Might not work but just a thought.
-
Mar 20, 2013, 02:48 PM
#15
The Money Pit main shaft could have been dug and then branched out with separate tunnels, like the Swiss bank theory, where separate stashes could be stored. These could sweep slightly upward (for drainange). To get the separate stashes out, the owners could dig straight down through virgin soil directly over top of the stashes.
As for who would engineer the Pit, good question. Someone organized, but not pirates. At least, not the normal ilk of pirates for the day (1700s).
Last Assault on Oak Island  Room of Fire
-
Mar 20, 2013, 03:37 PM
#16
 Troll
Oak Island and the Money Pit. After all the reading and research I have done, I have come to the conclusion that whomever coined the phrase the money pit got something right for a change. In 3000 years, they will dig the Chesapeake Bay Bridge tunnel and after multiple deaths from cave ins and drowning, the people will be sure it held great treasure and will spend gazillions to find it.
I don't know what the hole on Oak Island was, but I sure know what it is, a waste of time and money. No one buries treasure so far and so deep that even they can't get to it. Not realistic in my book. I feel the best of the best treasures are hidden in plain sight and completely misunderstood by the commoner staring at it.
example.....3 dollar bowl sells for millions.
Even the tombs of the Emperor’s and Pharaohs were found and accessible. And that was top notch hiding skills for the time period.
In my humble opinion of course.
From the archives of the human encylopedia on all things that don't matter. It is a disease. 
-
Mar 20, 2013, 08:32 PM
#17
So maybe just a deep hole with nothing of value? Who would dig it and why? It was a lot of work for a hoax.
Any thoughts?
Last Assault on Oak Island  Room of Fire
-
Mar 20, 2013, 09:59 PM
#18
Maybe they thought there was buried treasure there
-
Mar 21, 2013, 01:05 PM
#19
Well, someone dug it pre-1795 and setup the logs at ten-foot intervals. If they hid something, what was it? Or maybe they did hide something and got it already, maybe even before it was found by those boys in 1795. Maybe one of those flood tunnels was a backdoor in and the treasure was lifted out through that way.
Which still leaves, what was there?
If it's gone, I guess that's something we can't know now.
Last Assault on Oak Island  Room of Fire
-
Mar 31, 2013, 12:20 PM
#20
You would think with todays ground penetrating technology that something be seen or found
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
interesting treasure, intersting scences of treasure island, oak island time magazine, oak island treasure 2011, oak island treasure is not on oak island, oak island treasure statements, oak island treasure time magazine, where do they take the rocks fom long beach oak island
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|