Need HELP IDENTIFYING THESE ROCKS???

Stephydee

Jr. Member
May 5, 2017
21
7
Southern California
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • IMG_20170505_165800.jpg
    IMG_20170505_165800.jpg
    603.7 KB · Views: 95
  • IMG_20170505_163604.jpg
    IMG_20170505_163604.jpg
    597.7 KB · Views: 91
  • IMG_20170505_165004.jpg
    IMG_20170505_165004.jpg
    676.6 KB · Views: 91
  • IMG_20170505_205928.jpg
    IMG_20170505_205928.jpg
    1,016.1 KB · Views: 84
  • IMG_20170505_205819.jpg
    IMG_20170505_205819.jpg
    874.9 KB · Views: 105

Moesia

Full Member
Oct 26, 2016
207
127
Primary Interest:
Other
Pic 1 is a green pebble rounded by rivers it can not be identified by pictures. No 2 is just a white flash and you need to make a better photo. 3 looks like sandstone but is to blurry to identify positively. 4 seams to be sedimentary rock, can not be specified more. No 5 is interesting, try to make a better photo of that one.

Good luck.
 

Upvote 0

MartyRocks

Jr. Member
Dec 12, 2015
45
18
Nevada desert
Detector(s) used
None yet.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Whatever you are using to take pictures with... you need to focus on the rocks better.

You need to make sure the focus is on the center of each rock.

It will definitely help us to help you.
 

Upvote 0

DDancer

Bronze Member
Mar 25, 2014
2,339
2,002
Traveling US to work
Detector(s) used
Current Equinox 600
Past Whites DFX Garret GTI 2500 and others
Prospecting Minelab GPZ 7000
Past SD 2100 GP 3000 (retired)
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Yep better pictures. The round stone is what I'll simply call quartzite~ something with a quartz composition but otherwise no real identifiers. The second suffered from the flash of the camera but speculatively may be a bit of feldspar, third another quartzite *to blurry*, fourth as Moesia thinks appears to be sedimentary but I'd like to see the nodules in it, the last is what appears to be a granite or pegmatite.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
S

Stephydee

Jr. Member
May 5, 2017
21
7
Southern California
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I know it's been a while and Thank you all for your input. I'm very new to this site and forum posting( can u tell lol) I did take some better ones I'm going to see if I can upload them now.... Thank you again.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
S

Stephydee

Jr. Member
May 5, 2017
21
7
Southern California
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
DSC01127.JPG DSC01127.JPG
The ones above are the blurry flash
DSC01164.JPG
This is the fourth one from before
IMG_20170507_013404.jpg
Another one of the blurry flash
DSC01166.JPG
The fourth one
DSC01173.JPG
DSC01172.JPG
5th one
DSC01145.JPG
DSC01147.JPG
The green one. DSC01147.JPG DSC01147.JPG
I hope these are way better and clearer. They were taken with my camera n not my phone.
 

Upvote 0

DDancer

Bronze Member
Mar 25, 2014
2,339
2,002
Traveling US to work
Detector(s) used
Current Equinox 600
Past Whites DFX Garret GTI 2500 and others
Prospecting Minelab GPZ 7000
Past SD 2100 GP 3000 (retired)
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Much better pictures thanks :)
Pictures 1,2 and 4 are appear to be a worn shell, in the tip of it there appears to be whats left of a worm bore in the material. Technically its still a rock but nature made :)
Pictures 3,5 are a sandstone conglomerate. Vitrified mud if you will with some larger stones in it, one quartz for sure, source could be a stream or other body of water.
Pictures 6, 7 appear to be what I would call sugar quartz and the specks appear to be garnet. Sugar quartz is just porous fine grained quartz crystals and the coloration of the inclusions suggests garnet though magnetite can look similar.
Your last round stone appears to be a quartzite of some type also with possible garnet inclusions. My thoughts.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top