1827 Georgia Land Grant

itzyoboyandrew

Sr. Member
May 13, 2015
492
422
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Picked this up at a antique store for 4$
Date on one of the pages is 1827

It has 3 names mentioned:
Thomas Abercrombie
Carlton ?ilborn
Daniel Newman

It’s a grant for 202 and a half acres of land in Monroe County Georgia.
It also says it’s the scale of 20 chains. (Something with when they used surveyor chains)

41E38D96-3C1B-4A56-8ECE-BB0D21751EB9.jpeg 47BC3CFA-F496-4E8F-98F1-19AB7DE1CA36.jpeg 47BC3CFA-F496-4E8F-98F1-19AB7DE1CA36.jpeg
 

hucklburry

Jr. Member
Dec 18, 2010
98
62
My house, the front of it, is listed as built in 1820, its a hand hewn log cabin, been added on to two times. I traced back the ownership, I have 2 acres, but it used to be 130 acres, and the oldest I can find is the US landgrant of 1820 for it. It was hard to make the jump from the local archives to the Federal, but I found it here and printed a copy of mine:

https://glorecords.blm.gov/default.aspx

It looks like Georgia info might not be complete (maybe because you have the paperwork??), but worth looking around
 

GaRebel1861

Gold Member
Jun 16, 2011
5,758
6,783
South Carolina
🥇 Banner finds
4
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Here is one from Lee County Georgia dated the same year as yours - 1827. It is signed by then Governor Rabun.
 

Attachments

  • Lee Co. Ga. 1827.JPG
    Lee Co. Ga. 1827.JPG
    118.3 KB · Views: 72

Clay Diggins

Silver Member
Nov 14, 2010
4,886
14,260
The Great Southwest
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
It's an interesting bit of history. Nice find.

There were more than six million land grants issued so they aren't exactly rare. The Georgia grants were a big mess with a lot more grants being written than there was land to be sold.

If the patent were valid and complete with the chain of successions and assigns it would have value as fee to property. That's obviously not the case. It might hold special value for the families of the original grantees if you can find them.

Essentially the only value beyond that is in the eye of the beholder. They aren't rare so the old condition, condition, condition rule applies. Your's isn't in very good condition so it's worth only what a buyer will pay. You paid $4 for it so that's the established value unless you find a buyer who will pay more.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top