A lot of them are similar, but from closeup you can see that theyre dirty and old. I put a few under the microscope and there's sand embedded. Most of them are broken in some way though, so I think that it was the leftovers from someone's collection.they look suspiciously like they came from the same larger stone...as if someone was practicing flint knapping on their own...just saying.
The sun is going down and I have a $20 phone camera, but hopefully some of these pictures turned out. I think that the two you referenced are in there. I forgot to include a size reference, but all of these points in the closeups are pretty standard (less than 2 inches long).Looks like a lot of common field grade pieces with a couple or more nice ones in the mix. The kids will be thrilled to take any one of those home with them. Very cool gesture! Can we see a close up of the black Point to right of the word "your" in the 2nd picture and of the one in the bottom middle with the indented base in pic #3? Those look interesting. The black Point appears to have a "flute" or "channel" down the face and may be a reworked Clovis. It may just be the lighting too.
Thanks! I'll let him know. If there are others he should keep please let me know. Neither of us have any idea how to identify them.Thanks for the extra pictures. The black Point isn't fluted. It was just the lighting. But the other one I asked about, which is in pic #9 and #10 sure looks to be a Quad and would be Late Paleo/Early Archaic in age. He should probably keep that one.