Defective title: what constitutes, interpretation of knowledge and notice as defined by Code.

[Assembler]

"The State of Oregon" has only one definition for each of the following phrases:
1. Defective title; what constitutes.
2. Interpretation of knowledge and notice.

Both of the above phrases have comparative legislation in Cal., Idaho, Iowa, Wash. in one, and Cal., Idaho in the other.

Both can come to play a factor when there is a "Partnership" or in almost any "Notice" that can be worded with a "Person" who negotiates an instrument. This can include "Mining" instruments.

This is posted for some who may be interested in the discussion of information on this topic thread as there are enough people who live / do business in the above States.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[Assembler]

The board accused him of performing surveying work without a license.

They demanded he have a state license in order to speak.

According to the Institute for Justice, it sued after the state officials "sent him a series of threatening letters ordering him to stop publicly offering opinions about engineering without a license, on pain of potential criminal punishment."

Court holds that man has a right to talk about math IN PUBLIC!

'We rely on people to decide who they want to listen to'

https://www.wnd.com/2023/12/court-holds-man-right-talk-math-public/

His opinion held that the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors violated the First Amendment when it ordered Wayne Nutt not to speak about engineering issues.

 

[ConceptualizedNetherlandr]

The board accused him of performing surveying work without a license.

They demanded he have a state license in order to speak.

According to the Institute for Justice, it sued after the state officials "sent him a series of threatening letters ordering him to stop publicly offering opinions about engineering without a license, on pain of potential criminal punishment."

Court holds that man has a right to talk about math IN PUBLIC!

'We rely on people to decide who they want to listen to'

https://www.wnd.com/2023/12/court-holds-man-right-talk-math-public/

His opinion held that the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors violated the First Amendment when it ordered Wayne Nutt not to speak about engineering issues.

Most licensure laws are about practice for money (hire) . I never heard of this sort of opinion oppression before.

 

[Assembler]

Most licensure laws are about practice for money (hire) . I never heard of this sort of opinion oppression before.

Yep just looking at this for some possible pointers and tips. Does not happen very often so best to tune in and take a look.

 

[Assembler]

This has just come to my attention so we shall see with a little more digging into.

 

[Assembler]

FEDERAL JUDGE HANDS FREE-SPEECH VICTORY TO RETIRED ENGINEER

Court holds that state officials violated the First Amendment when they ordered retired engineer Wayne Nutt to stop talking about math in public.

https://ij.org/press-release/federal-judge-hands-free-speech-victory-to-retired-engineer/

“State licensing boards nationwide increasingly act as if they are boards of censors, deciding who may or may not speak about the topics they regulate,” explained IJ Attorney Joe Gay. “Today’s ruling is a powerful reminder that in this country we rely on people to decide who they want to listen to. We don’t rely on government boards to decide who gets to speak.”