dirtlooter
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2014
- Messages
- 8,889
- Reaction score
- 13,499
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- mid western ARK
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 3
- Detector(s) used
- XP Deus with 9"LF and 9" HF Coils and 600 Equinox with stock and 6" coils
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
I understand that there is a time and a place for nearly everything but....... When I hunt an area, I usually choose the set up or program that I am going to use. I have the Deus with HF coil and the 600 NOX so I have various freq options to consider, even the multi freq. I also understand that no one set up or program is going to be a fix all or get it all program...too many variables involved at any given spot. BUT IT SURE WOULD BE NICE IF THERE WAS! So I see all of these tests where a particular machine would only hit certain targets when set up specifically this particular way or that way. And I wonder how often anyone would actually do it that way in the first place.
So this helps to explain why most spots are never truly hunted out by any one particular machine. So to me, if one has a machine or several that enable you to hunt a spot in one set up or program and then you are able to by the nature of altering your machine(s) in the various ways that we can, then one should in theory be able to find things missed by your previous program. To me this means that one has to be willing to go back to these sites and hunt possibly with extreme changes to find some of the missed targets. Having said all of that, I can easily see where having two or more high quality different machines can really pay off (eventually) because of being even more versatile. I also feel that there is no perfect machine that perfectly does every thing but a particular machine may be the best (at the moment) for your applications and so you like it the best (right now.)
So does any of this make any sense? I was taking a break from changing out a wax seal on a commode in very tight quarters LOL. Plus I can get very confused with what was done or not done with various machines in comparison air tests. I do love the KISS principal. Venting in the bathroom!
So this helps to explain why most spots are never truly hunted out by any one particular machine. So to me, if one has a machine or several that enable you to hunt a spot in one set up or program and then you are able to by the nature of altering your machine(s) in the various ways that we can, then one should in theory be able to find things missed by your previous program. To me this means that one has to be willing to go back to these sites and hunt possibly with extreme changes to find some of the missed targets. Having said all of that, I can easily see where having two or more high quality different machines can really pay off (eventually) because of being even more versatile. I also feel that there is no perfect machine that perfectly does every thing but a particular machine may be the best (at the moment) for your applications and so you like it the best (right now.)
So does any of this make any sense? I was taking a break from changing out a wax seal on a commode in very tight quarters LOL. Plus I can get very confused with what was done or not done with various machines in comparison air tests. I do love the KISS principal. Venting in the bathroom!