Adze or core

Older The Better

Silver Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
3,663
Reaction score
7,539
Golden Thread
0
Location
south east kansas
Detector(s) used
Whites Eagle Spectrum
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Found this about a week ago among some other flint and burned bone and mussel shells and pottery. I keep wondering if it’s not an adze. I’d hate to lump a tool in with my flint scraps. What do you guys think?

ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1588033764.579184.webp
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1588033810.381393.webp
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1588033853.288829.webp
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1588033893.789547.webp
 

Upvote 0
By looking at it from the side angle as in the last photo, it has the shape of a chopper or a scraper. But there doesn't appear a lot of work around the edges. May have been utilized as a core.
 

IMO FWIW the flakes removed from it were too large to have been removed when it was in its present form; they were struck off while it was still part of the parent nucleus it was removed from, Levallois-style.

Notice the stepped removals from the irregular edge and the battering of the edge opposite it.

It's a piece esquille -- a splitting wedge. Probably used to split bones for their marrow.
 

looks like a scraper or some type of hand tool.
 

It's definitely more than just a flint scrap. My quick glance was an adze like thingy that might have also been used as a core. Here are some that are typical of south Texas, but I think they are relatively common in places were hardstone tools aren't as common.

https://texasbeyondhistory.net/st-plains/prehistory/images/adzes.html

But Uniface could be on to something there as well.
 

Great! I was really borderline about that one, I find larger hunks of flint but they usually don’t have an intentional shape like this one. Uniface might be the closest based on the bone showing burning and food processing.

I always like finding cut marks. Proof of human processing over an animal dragging a deer rib around.
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1588077228.475968.webp

Thanks to all, i hope to tell the full story of that site some day this is a welcome bit of information.
 

Goethe said:
What's the hardest thing for you to see? It's what's in front of your face !

A centuries-old axiom in the fine arts: "Everybody looks. What you have to do is, learn to see." Artifacts are stories in stone. They can be read, assuming lithic literacy on the part of the one studying them.

In this case, starting with the distal side (first picture), notice that those broad flakes could not have been struck from a piece that small. For one thing, percussion flakes start narrow and spread out (fan-shapes). These are already wide, indicating that they were struck from further back from where the edges of it are now. For another thing, even if some way had been found around this, a work piece that small would "give" with the force of the removing blows unless it were immobilized in a vice, so the flakes would have petered out (been unable to "run" as far as the flake scars on that show that they did).

So what the top side tells you is that the knapper was using a Levallois strategy, striking flakes off from the periphery toward the center (without reaching it) while this was still part of a much larger block, then lifting it off with an impact from the right-angled edge. (Interestingly, although Levallois flakes typically have big bulbs of percussion, this one doesn't, which would point to the use of a punch rather than direct percussion with a hammerstone). (Levallois technology never stopped being useful, so it never went out of use).

In the second picture (ventral side), on the ragged edge you see heavy stepping that runs directly along the latitudinal axis. This is the same flake behavior you see in bipolar percussion, where a pebble is struck while held on an anvil stone (remember the part about small pieces "giving" with the force of a blow, not being heavy enough to resist them ?). In this case, the mechanics are those of a wedge that was struck from the opposite edge being used on something hard (bone rather than wood). And sure enough, the edge opposite the stepped side shows battering/crushing from repeated blows with a hammerstone.
 

Great assessment, I’ve always felt that rocks in general can be read that way too. Playing with flint knapping certainly helps read the stone artifacts but I’ve still got a ways to go to reach that level.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom