At Last....The Truth

aarthrj3811

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
9,256
Reaction score
1,176
Golden Thread
0
Location
Northern Nevada
Detector(s) used
Dowsing Rods and a Ranger Tell Examiner
The whole thing about the ideomotor response is that this is why it is necessary to use a double-blind test to prove dowsing works.

Weeks of running around in circles... Some one said the magic words. No more smoke screens. No more excuses. Carl, AF, SWR etc. Explain to us how Ideomotor Response is conected to Double Blind test, Ideomotor Effects. paranormal, chance guessing, Fliping coins, etc. This is your whole ball game...
Ideomotor. not reflex but motivated by an idea ,,,,,,
re·sponse
Pronunciation: ri-'spän(t)s
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English & Latin; Middle English respounce, from Anglo-French respuns, respounce, from Latin responsum reply, from neuter of responsus, past participle of respondEre
1 : an act of responding
2 : something constituting a reply or a reaction: as a : a verse, phrase, or word sung or said by the people or choir after or in reply to the officiant in a liturgical service b : the activity or inhibition of previous activity of an organism or any of its parts resulting from stimulation c : the output of a transducer or detecting device resulting from a given input
synonym see ANSWER .....

If you want more answers ....Learn to dowse
 

Guess I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask... can you formulate a specific question(s)?
 

All this test crap is really starting to bore me. Is this a dowsing forum or a Randi, Carl promotion forum?
 

Dell Winders said:
The TNET Dowsing forum has again been allowed to become a platform for the Skeptic Society agenda, and if a Dowser addresses this issue in the form of a complaint against the Skepic society, history shows that the entire Dowsing forum is subject to disappear without notice. Your interest to have a total Dowsing forum free of non- Dowsing antagonist is in vain.

TNET has set aside a forum only for Dowsing proponnents at the top of the page. A forum is also set up for Skeptics only, but not used very much.

If you dare to post in this section any view is subject to immediate attack, and arguments are permitted to ensue. That is what TNET appears to want as their reason for having three forums on the subject of Dowsing, when two forums would have been suffecient.

A Bickering & arguing mentality will attract viewers of the same mentality to TNET and this forum. Although it is degrading to Treasure Hunters, it's obvious it works for TNET, and will continue as long as Treasure Hunters try to defend a positive view of Dowsing, against the negative view attacks of non-dowsing critics.

We all have the Free choice options of posting on the Dowsing proponnents forum, don't complain about this forum, or leave.

Dowsing forum, in my opinion, is an inappropriate title. How about renaming it "Critics" forum? Then everybody can jump into the arguing and bickering, with No complaint. Dell
You know, you have your own forum if you don't like it here, Dell.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom