Creek find??na?

Dirtybynature

Jr. Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
39
Reaction score
16
Golden Thread
0
Location
Alpharetta, Ga
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1625976454.500454.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1625976491.771782.webp
 

Upvote 0
Looks like sand stone or a old chunk of cement. Whatever it is it's not artifact related.
 

Speaking for all of your posts, there are select types of stone that make it possible to shape in a predictable way. Mostly flint but quartz and obsidian come to mind. Your finds appear to be sandstone or limestone which aren’t preferred materials. Also I don’t see any signs of any flake scars where they would have been removing chips to shape the material. Lastly speaking broadly there are exceptions but I don’t see any function in the shape of these finds obviously weren’t points or drills or knives or hoes… but keep looking the more you work with artifacts and rocks the easier it becomes to tell.
 

Just wondering? I see areas on some stones that imho look worked?should I try to close up on that area for input or am I making myself look further ridiculous :-)?
 

Just wondering? I see areas on some stones that imho look worked?should I try to close up on that area for input or am I making myself look further ridiculous :-)?

Nothing in pictures shows signs of being worked, also wrong kind of rock.
 

Personally show what you want, it could be helpful to learn, I don’t fault anyone for wanting to learn, I still am, for sure. Things go south when the poster gets combative. There are a lot of similar posts and there are members (that I appreciate) don’t mind doing the dirty work of shooting a poster down haha. I thought I’d tell a little bit of why because I’ve never been one to be satisfied with because I said so.
 

Yeti effigy. He is leaning on a log.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom