Oh man, that is one of the stupidest ideas I've heard this month.
Imagine the lawsuits waiting to happen from implementing this. "Oh no! Johnnie went to play in that doctored sand and it cut up his feet and hands!" <video clip on evening news showing little kid screaming as he walks toward parent (who
just happens to have a video camera) dripping blood all over the place>
It won't matter if it's claimed that the glass was ground down to a 'safe' size. ("Well, you
missed some...") Somebody unprincipled enough to stage such an incident could very well hit the jackpot...
The sea turtle argument is actually a pretty good one. ("What would glass shards do to the shells of endangered sea turtle eggs?") I sense 10+ years of environmental impact studies would be needed (hint hint) to prove that it's not harmful to wildlife, which would derail the project from the outset. Where's Greenpeace when ya need'em?
Of course, the easiest and
cheapest solution would be to just
buy all the affected beachfront property, demolish any structures on it, convert it to dunes, and let nature take it's course.
p.s. All you out-of-staters, please feel free to call our FL politicians all the nasty names you want. They don't listen to us FL folk anymore...
