Garrett ATX Pro vs Minelab 7000 GPZ

Rail Dawg

Sr. Member
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
495
Reaction score
909
Golden Thread
0
Location
Northern Nevada
Detector(s) used
MineLab GPZ 7000
Garrett ATX
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
$2300 vs $8000

We detect all the time for gold in Rye Patch.

We’ve been using the Garrett ATX Pro and it’s a great detector.

We need another detector as sharing one is a waste of valuable time.

Thinking now of moving up to the Minelab 7000 GPZ.

Big cost difference!

Thoughts?
 

Upvote 0
GPZ 7000 is certainly the top of the heap. However, can you really afford it? I always tell people to buy the best they can legitimately afford. I still find gold behind a GPZ using the 2300 and 4500. My buddies never get it all, and neither do I. I myself firmly believe it's more about the operator than it is the machine.

The cost difference is a big jump in technology. However spending lots of money on the latest and greatest technology doesn't necessarily mean more gold found. So I say know your budget and stick to it. Dennis
 

Have you given any thought to a VLF? Maybe a Goldbug II, or Pro? :skullflag:
 

I found that vlf in low to medium mineralization rocks however mineralization kills it , that’s where the more expensive rigs take over.

However if you ever come across a nugget this size you just need a carrot stick over any of those super expensive machines

4C62A76F-FF16-4F13-8405-6086D2894DB2.webp


Cheers Terry (in good clean fun friend)

80ECFFB0-CA80-4B55-A435-06DC972B8C20.webp
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom