Heat treating

CreekSide

Silver Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2023
Messages
4,538
Reaction score
17,758
Golden Thread
0

Attachments

  • IMG_2619.webp
    IMG_2619.webp
    69.4 KB · Views: 52
  • IMG_2621.webp
    IMG_2621.webp
    310.9 KB · Views: 53
Upvote 8
It may just be a personal opinion but I never thought of it as a hard line, I always looked at it as groups became less wide ranging and locked into a certain area they had to rely more heavily on local resources and heat treating made less desirable stone more workable. So it’s more a result of subsistence strategy at any given place and time vs a technological change like ceramics or the bow
 

In central IL they started heating flint regularly in the middle archaic. Extremely rare to see any paleo or early archaic flint that was heated. Won’t say they never did it, but we never see it. With a higher population using flint sources that had been picked over for 5000 yrs, the middle archaic was forced to use more common but lesser quality flint. Heating improved it considerably with easier chipping, increased gloss and color. As a flintknapper, I’ve cooked a ton of flint. At first I buried it in sand and started a wood fire on it. Later I bought a kiln for better control. 550F is the magic number for heatable midwestern cherts. Western material like agate takes less. There’s an art to it, about half guesswork, and a lot of material gets accidentally destroyed trying to heat it.
 

The knife posted is the older SR which is middle archaic period so around 5000 BP
 

I have seen heat treated artifacts from South Africa of over 80,000 years ago... so....
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom