Is this something special or just plain common? **-PICS-**

  • Thread starter Thread starter K
  • Start date Start date

K

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
210
Reaction score
2
Golden Thread
0
Location
MI
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • SAM_2080.webp
    SAM_2080.webp
    10.4 KB · Views: 318
  • SAM_2103.webp
    SAM_2103.webp
    5.1 KB · Views: 306
  • SAM_2092.webp
    SAM_2092.webp
    10.5 KB · Views: 310
  • SAM_2095.webp
    SAM_2095.webp
    7.9 KB · Views: 313
  • SAM_2096.webp
    SAM_2096.webp
    7 KB · Views: 308
Sorry I Don't see anything Unusual
 

jeff of pa said:
Sorry I Don't see anything Unusual

Jeff, the OP is trying to point out the "filled D" mintmark of the 79 Rosie. He was told in another section of TNet that it is common and carries no additional premium to a collector. It isn't an error rather the overuse of a die smashing dimes and the degradation of the die and "glop" filling voids in the die. Comparing a die from the 70's to one in this millennium is rather pointless as the Mint's engravers periodically retool dies to clean them up and add/accentuate details.
 

1979 Roosevelt Dimes from the San Franciso Mint had two series, Type 1 (Blobbed S) - similar to your Blobbed "D" and the true "S" after they discovered the die was causing problems and created a new one without the Blobbed S (Type II).

Same might hold true for the Denver mint as well. Worth checking into, I wouldn't just pass it off as a grease filled die until I further researched the issue, seems 1979 was a problem year for the Roosevelt dimes and the mints.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom