FLauthor
Hero Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2004
- Messages
- 770
- Reaction score
- 204
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Minneola, FL
- Detector(s) used
- Excalibur 800; Fisher F5; White Beachmaster VLF
- Primary Interest:
- Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
Everyone who metal detects the 1715 wrecks know approximately where their remains lie. Everytime there is a weather front drifting up the coast, ya'll are seeking a cut.
To hell with the cuts, make your own cut. Indian Relic hunters have to dig a 4 foot deep x 4 foot square hole to screen for stone relics. Why not dig a similar hole in the vicinity of those wrecks at low tide. It's give you a added advantage of 48 inches in depth that you can scan in all directions. It's a pig in the poke but if a Reale popped up or Escudo then it'd be all worth it. In Nome, Alaska, they mine the beaches for gold. Digging a hole is a lot of work but one good find would make the day. I mentioned this years ago and some TH'ers didn't like it like its a trade secret. Has anyone tried this method of searching?
To hell with the cuts, make your own cut. Indian Relic hunters have to dig a 4 foot deep x 4 foot square hole to screen for stone relics. Why not dig a similar hole in the vicinity of those wrecks at low tide. It's give you a added advantage of 48 inches in depth that you can scan in all directions. It's a pig in the poke but if a Reale popped up or Escudo then it'd be all worth it. In Nome, Alaska, they mine the beaches for gold. Digging a hole is a lot of work but one good find would make the day. I mentioned this years ago and some TH'ers didn't like it like its a trade secret. Has anyone tried this method of searching?
