Obamacare set to collapse under own regulations as the liberal entitlement-state

Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
12,824
Reaction score
7,901
Golden Thread
0
Location
New Hampshire
Detector(s) used
Garret Master hunter Cx Plus
Primary Interest:
Other
Obamacare set to collapse under own regulations as the liberal entitlement-state dream crumbles

National Review Online According to Larry Kudlow, the liberal entitlement-state dream is crumbling.

Writing for National Review Online, Kudlow asks these pertinent questions: "Why is it that Americans don't have the freedom to choose their own health insurance? I just don't get it. Why must the liberal nanny state make decisions for us? We can make them ourselves, thank you very much. It's like choosing a car, buying a home, or investing in a stock. We can handle it.

"So why must the government tell me and everyone else what we can and cannot buy?"

He aptly states, as noted by Charles Krauthammer and The Wall Street Journal's Dan Henninger, that Obamacare has become the greatest expansion to date of the liberal entitlement-state dream. But that is a dream that he, like many people, does not want. As a healthy 60-something-year-old, he also says, "I don't want lactation and maternity services, abortion services, speech therapy, mammograms, fertility treatments, or Viagra. I don't want it. So why should I have to tear up my existing health-care plan, and then buy a plan with far more expensive premiums and deductibilities and with services I don't need or want?

"Why? Because Team Obama says I have to. And that's not much of a reason. It's not freedom."

Obama has for years told the American people that they would be able to keep their health insurance plans if they so choose, but, as recently reported in the media, the Obama administration has known for three years that the "Affordable" Care Act's excessive, inflexible regulations would cause as many as 15 million individuals to lose their coverage.

After that news came out into the open, Obama tried placing the blame on insurance companies, rather than the stiff regulations in his signature legislation. However, it was too late, as the American people, and even facets of the mainstream media, have lost trust in the president and turned against Obamacare.

Kudlow points out the ridiculousness of Obama's statements "that so many of these existing plans are substandard 'bad apples,'" and that insurance at the state level is one of the most regulated areas of the economy. He then goes on to note the complete lack of fairness in Obamacare's attempt to redistribute wealth from the young and healthy to the elderly and diseased.

Kudlow concludes his article thusly: "Between the president's broken promises, the millions of policy cancellations, the continued website breakdowns, and the unaffordable, unfair con game between the healthy young and the sicker old, this Obamacare monster is well on its way to collapsing of its own weight. But here's the bigger point: All this is the inevitable result of massive central-planning exercises to control the economy. That's not freedom.

"No amount of rescue legislation is going to change this. It's the elections of 2014 and 2016 that will allow the American people to reject this Soviet-style planning. But I'll reference my conservative colleagues in the media once again: Obamacare represents the greatest-ever expansion of the liberal entitlement-state dream. And you know what? That dream is crumbling and dissolving before our very eyes.

"And that is freedom."

You can read Larry Kudlow's full article here. More of his articles for National Review are also available to read here.
 

"Do the president and his people not know that insurance at the state level is one of the most regulated areas of the economy?"

That, of course, is why health insurance isn't sold across state lines - no matter how much some right wing nutz whine about it.

Good luck to all,

~The Old Bookaroo

PS: This article was already posted on TN (11/2/2013).
 

Posts not related to thread will be deleted.

We will NOT go quitely into the night!
 

"Do the president and his people not know that insurance at the state level is one of the most regulated areas of the economy?"

That, of course, is why health insurance isn't sold across state lines - no matter how much some right wing nutz whine about it.

Good luck to all,

~The Old Bookaroo

PS: This article was already posted on TN (11/2/2013).

I have no issue with state level, I have major issue with feds telling me what I have to buy or cant buy when it comes to my insurance..




Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

.



We will NOT go quitely into the night!
 

Wish we could find a way to make banking legal across state lines.
 

Dave44:

All that would take would be (1.) A system of Federal banking regulations; and (2.) A national fund available to make depositors whole if the bank fails.

Up until the Great Depression we had state-regulated banks. With rather mixed results.

Bank of Italy wasn't allowed to expand into Southern California from the San Francisco Bay Area because the state didn't like the workingman's Italian-immigrant owned institution. When Bank of America down in LA failed, they let Bank of Italy purchase it (because no other bank would).


Good luck to all,

~The Old Bookaroo
 

Obamacare is going to go one of two ways. First, it survives because the dumb congress prints a quadzillion more dollars which will make the ones out there worth less and less, hello hyperinflation and civil unrest or 2) it crashes and burns. I don't think there will be any in between.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom