please help me to grade this US silver coins

lazooro

Sr. Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
370
Reaction score
5
Golden Thread
0
Location
Sezana
Detector(s) used
ACE 250, TESORO TEJON
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • DSC02795.webp
    DSC02795.webp
    151.8 KB · Views: 360
  • DSC02796.webp
    DSC02796.webp
    130 KB · Views: 371
  • DSC02798.webp
    DSC02798.webp
    111.7 KB · Views: 376
  • DSC02799.webp
    DSC02799.webp
    131 KB · Views: 377
  • DSC02800.webp
    DSC02800.webp
    132.8 KB · Views: 372
  • DSC02801.webp
    DSC02801.webp
    117.1 KB · Views: 361
  • DSC02802.webp
    DSC02802.webp
    102.4 KB · Views: 362
  • DSC02803.webp
    DSC02803.webp
    111.6 KB · Views: 356
  • DSC02804.webp
    DSC02804.webp
    90.6 KB · Views: 353
  • DSC02797.webp
    DSC02797.webp
    154.5 KB · Views: 361
allen said:
might need to resize your pics,
hard to tell anything when the pic
is that big.

you can hold the ctrl key and roll the wheel on the mouse..
 

LaZoOro said:
allen said:
might need to resize your pics,
hard to tell anything when the pic
is that big.

you can hold the ctrl key and roll the wheel on the mouse..

Cant help ...but cool trick on the ctl and roll thing....dident know I could do that ! :thumbsup:
 

I would give the 1917 quarter VF20, the 1918 EF45. Unfortunately the rest of the coins have been heavily polished greatly lowering collector value.
 

The CTRL+scroll is neat, except that it's changing the size of the entire browser, and not just the photos.
So here ya go... :thumbsup:

Bran <><
 

Attachments

  • 1.webp
    1.webp
    38.7 KB · Views: 319
  • 2.webp
    2.webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 321
  • 3.webp
    3.webp
    34.2 KB · Views: 306
  • 4.webp
    4.webp
    27.3 KB · Views: 298
  • 5.webp
    5.webp
    31.5 KB · Views: 305
  • 6.webp
    6.webp
    32.1 KB · Views: 309
  • 7.webp
    7.webp
    26.5 KB · Views: 295
  • 8.webp
    8.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 301
  • 9.webp
    9.webp
    24.7 KB · Views: 302
  • 10.webp
    10.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 309
godisnum1 said:
The CTRL+scroll is neat, except that it's changing the size of the entire browser, and not just the photos.
So here ya go... :thumbsup:

Bran <><

thx a lot!!
 

l.cutler said:
I would give the 1917 quarter VF20, the 1918 EF45. Unfortunately the rest of the coins have been heavily polished greatly lowering collector value.

thx for grade!! i can guarantee that no polishing is made to this coins..maybe scans would be better than pics?
 

Different pictures may help. The 1913 may be OK or not hard to tell from photos.. The 1923 I think is cleaned,but again could be wrong. The Columbian half is definitely polished, maybe not since you have had it but remember it has been around over 100 years! A hands on look is always best.
 

l.cutler said:
Different pictures may help. The 1913 may be OK or not hard to tell from photos.. The 1923 I think is cleaned,but again could be wrong. The Columbian half is definitely polished, maybe not since you have had it but remember it has been around over 100 years! A hands on look is always best.

can we tell it is polished because we can see black marks around letters and numbers??
 

Attachments

  • DSC02795.webp
    DSC02795.webp
    91.5 KB · Views: 288
:)
 

Attachments

  • 11.webp
    11.webp
    32.1 KB · Views: 279
LaZoOro said:
l.cutler said:
Different pictures may help. The 1913 may be OK or not hard to tell from photos.. The 1923 I think is cleaned,but again could be wrong. The Columbian half is definitely polished, maybe not since you have had it but remember it has been around over 100 years! A hands on look is always best.

can we tell it is polished because we can see black marks around letters and numbers??
Yeah, that is a good indication,the protected areas around the letters were not hit by the cleaning, also the surfaces have an unnatural smoothness and shine that would not be there on a natural worn coin. Compare to the natural surfaces on the standing liberty quarters. The color of the Buffalo nickels appear to be unnaturally bright, perhaps dthey look different in hand though. The lower portion of the reverse of the 1923 also appears to be too "shiny". Nothing can replace a good hands on examination though.
 

Yeah, that is a good indication,the protected areas around the letters were not hit by the cleaning, also the surfaces have an unnatural smoothness and shine that would not be there on a natural worn coin. Compare to the natural surfaces on the standing liberty quarters. The color of the Buffalo nickels appear to be unnaturally bright, perhaps dthey look different in hand though. The lower portion of the reverse of the 1923 also appears to be too "shiny". Nothing can replace a good hands on examination though.
[/quote]

thx again and the fact is good hands examination is crucial..
thx to all and much luck
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom