bigscoop
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,541
- Reaction score
- 9,086
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Wherever there be treasure!
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
Here's a couple thoughts on Captain Thomas Beale/Beall. In my mind, here’s what’s really at issue in this ongoing debate/search for the right Thomas Beale:
If we accept the story as it was told in the Beale Papers then Beale was elected as Captain by the members of his assembled “civilian” party, therefore there would be no official military record of this Captain Thomas Beale/Beall, or of the party’s thirty members during the period in question. The only way military records for these men would exist during the period in question is if they were active military personnel at the time, which would then strongly suggest that they were acting under military direction, which means the Beale Papers could no longer be taken at face value.
As for an ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall, performing a civilian action under a previous military title, it’s very possible, if not even likely. However, if this is the case then there was only two American ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall that I know of who remain as suspect and whose activities during the period in question, 1817 – 1821, remain largely unknown. Both of these men were at the battle of New Orleans. As far as I know, there are no more American ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall who could have been active during the period in question, 1817 – 1821.
PS: You'll also encounter "Major" Beale's, etc.
If we accept the story as it was told in the Beale Papers then Beale was elected as Captain by the members of his assembled “civilian” party, therefore there would be no official military record of this Captain Thomas Beale/Beall, or of the party’s thirty members during the period in question. The only way military records for these men would exist during the period in question is if they were active military personnel at the time, which would then strongly suggest that they were acting under military direction, which means the Beale Papers could no longer be taken at face value.
As for an ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall, performing a civilian action under a previous military title, it’s very possible, if not even likely. However, if this is the case then there was only two American ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall that I know of who remain as suspect and whose activities during the period in question, 1817 – 1821, remain largely unknown. Both of these men were at the battle of New Orleans. As far as I know, there are no more American ex-Captain Thomas Beale/Beall who could have been active during the period in question, 1817 – 1821.

PS: You'll also encounter "Major" Beale's, etc.