jimzz977
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 1,791
- Reaction score
- 4,707
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- New Mexico
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab Etrac
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
I can't speak to the authenticity of the coin but a lot of earlier coins (including a few I myself have dug) do use IIII instead of IV so I don't think that is any reason to say it is a fake. Here is the numista page for the coin: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces41352.htmlAlso I would say it is a fake. Particularly due to how the Roman numerals are. It should read Carolus IV not Carolus IIII. Also what is the hole in the coin?
Not sure i guess it was made so they won't lose it