The debates continue

Kantuckkeean

Bronze Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
1,608
Reaction score
1,884
Golden Thread
0
Location
Cornfield, IN
Detector(s) used
F-22, cheapo pinpointer
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Upvote 0
Pretty cool. I think many archaeologists believe that there were people here earlier than the commonly accepted period, but they are unable to prove it without proper finds. The problem is the restrictive nature of laws pertaining to artifacts. Most discoveries are made by private citizens who are scared to introduce sites to the government. I've seen some artifacts that are mind-blowing, but not inspected by archaeologists because of this fear.
 

That’s what I’m dealing with.
 

I could find a Neanderthal riding a unicorn on a saddle of dinosaur bones and in the eyes of science and therefore the world it wouldn’t count. Don’t waste your time.
 

Faces? Hardly. Now the arkies are starting to get delusional. What next? Gary
 

Sorry, they are just natural rock formed by nature not man.
 

I guess the clouds that look like animals and people are artifacts as well?
 

I could find a Neanderthal riding a unicorn on a saddle of dinosaur bones and in the eyes of science and therefore the world it wouldn’t count. Don’t waste your time.

You posted a water worn quartz rock. I wouldn’t comment on anything if I were you. I posted a quarts point for you. It’s very crude, but still able to tell it’s been worked
ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1531829116.669786.webp
 

Last edited:
And btw. That green face I posted above was found in Newark, Ohio, at the earthworks site, buried in the Indian mounds. That’s about 90 miles south of me.
 

You posted a water worn quartz rock. I wouldn’t comment on anything if I were you. I posted a quarts point for you. It’s very crude, but still able to tell it’s been worked
View attachment 1612708

Sometimes the thrill of discovery allows you too miss the truly obvious.
 

You’re saying that has not been altered by hands? C’mon lol
 

That looks worked from just the one dimensional photo, but it could just as well be a creek tumbled piece of material. More pictures of each side would help. Your Quartz piece looks to be a rough Point too. The Axe though, sorry I just don't see it.

Have you taken it to an ASO show in Hilliard? Lots of very experienced collectors and some archaeologists at each show. You should look into it and go to one.
 

LMAO!!! The subject line of this post was meant to describe the experts debating on the length of time that humans have occupied the Americas... Not these rock vs artifact debates! Whatever. I’m game! Let this Festivus begin with the Airing of Grievances!! I got a lot of problems with you people! And now you’re gonna hear about it!

Kindest regards,
Kantuck
 

Last edited:
I’ve spoken with several archaeologist in the last few years and almost all of them will not acknowledge anything preclovis. They are the 25-30 year experts that are not open to new evidence.
One expert that I spoke with was the most helpful, but he was cautious with his wording. He told me that “NA was inhabited a long time ago, but they don’t know much about them or who they were.” He said, “it’s not a lack of evidence, it’s a lack of funding and man power.”
There are sites all over the country that have been dated to 50k years ago. One in California that’s 150k, but they are scrutinized by the life long archaeologists that don’t want to see their ideas shattered. The Clovis first model has already fallen, it’s just going to take time until it’s accepted. The site in South Carolina is a perfect example, also Old Vero beach in Florida. The really old sites, are off the coast of Georgia under 400ft of water.
 

Think what you want about me just make sure your thoughts and actions are not driven by ego or selfishness
 

Mods should delete post's that don't pertain to this thread.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom