The Hart's Person to Person Visit With J.B. Ward Confirmation The Beale Papers True

[masterpoe]

Mr Hart had personally confirmed the Beale Papers True with a face to face with Mr J. B. Ward and his son John Ward ! One of a few Confirmations that the Beale Papers are True! The flat Earth guys are going to have quite a problem with this one! They were invited but have not seen anyone of them yet.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[bigscoop]

Mr Hart had personally confirmed the Beale Papers True with a face to face with Mr J. B. Ward and his son John Ward ! One of a few Confirmations that the Beale Papers are True! The flat Earth guys are going to have quite a problem with this one! They were invited but have not seen anyone of them yet.

Ummm....actually, he never confirmed that the tale was true, only the origins of the publication. This in now way confirms the story's marvelous adventure or the described details in the adventure. This is why, to date, true "scholars and experts" all conclude that there still isn't one stitch of directly connecting supporting evidence in favor of the story's marvelous details. These being the same "scholars and experts" that quickly point out there isn't one stitch of evidence in support of that fabulous French mining operation you often reference, and so on and so on.

 

[Five]

Mr Hart had personally confirmed the Beale Papers True with a face to face with Mr J. B. Ward and his son John Ward ! One of a few Confirmations that the Beale Papers are True! The flat Earth guys are going to have quite a problem with this one! They were invited but have not seen anyone of them yet.

Excellently executed!!

 

[Five]

Mr Hart had personally confirmed the Beale Papers True with a face to face with Mr J. B. Ward and his son John Ward ! One of a few Confirmations that the Beale Papers are True! The flat Earth guys are going to have quite a problem with this one! They were invited but have not seen anyone of them yet.

Excellently worked!!

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Not certain that it was CONFIRMED as a TRUE story; ONLY that the "content" was in the "BPP".

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Ummm....actually, he never confirmed that the tale was true, only the origins of the publication. This in now way confirms the story's marvelous adventure or the described details in the adventure. This is why, to date, true "scholars and experts" all conclude that there still isn't one stitch of directly connecting supporting evidence in favor of the story's marvelous details. These being the same "scholars and experts" that quickly point out there isn't one stitch of evidence in support of that fabulous French mining operation you often reference, and so on and so on.

INDEED!

 

[bigscoop]

INDEED!

True believers will always believe. Doesn't matter to them if any of it is true or not, they just need to believe in it.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

LOL! HA! Just be like "FOX", and say... "I WANNA believe"; heh...

 

[Five]

True believers will always believe. Doesn't matter to them if any of it is true or not, they just need to believe in it.

Truely unbelievable, that something can be confused so much with jibjab yet have been found truthful.

 

[franklin]

Truely unbelievable, that something can be confused so much with jibjab yet have been found truthful.

Just because George Hart wrote that in his papers he gave to the Roanoke Virginia Library about what his brother Clayton Hart may or may not have said does not make it verifiable as the truth. It takes a lot more than that to establish whether the Job Print Pamphlet is truly a story about treasure or a true story about treasure.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Well, I NEVER found it in the Roanoke Library on Elm Street; I LOOKED!

 

[franklin]

Well, I NEVER found it in the Roanoke Library on Elm Street; I LOOKED!

You can read them on line at angelfire ron gervais site

 

[Rebel - KGC]

OK. THANKS!

 

[Rebel - KGC]

NOT as good as the ORIGINAL Manuscript...

 

[Five]

Just because George Hart wrote that in his papers he gave to the Roanoke Virginia Library about what his brother Clayton Hart may or may not have said does not make it verifiable as the truth. It takes a lot more than that to establish whether the Job Print Pamphlet is truly a story about treasure or a true story about treasure.

You have set before everyone a very hard thing to do!. Even it we all could go back in time and see Beale give the box to Morriss in 1822. No one of you would charged there mind, but even if they could touch the treasurer they still wouldn't believe that the Beale Papers are true! Their heads may explode, but there minds would not change. They would just come up with some far out theory like they do now.

 

[franklin]

You have set before everyone a very hard thing to do!. Even it we all could go back in time and see Beale give the box to Morriss in 1822. No one of you would charged there mind, but even if they could touch the treasurer they still wouldn't believe that the Beale Papers are true! Their heads may explode, but there minds would not change. They would just come up with some far out theory like they do now.

You make us out to be naysayers no matter what? You find proof of any exchange between Robert Morriss and the author of a box containing the letters and the codes, I will not only believe you, I will do my best to come and see you and shake your hand. So far you have shown no proof whatsoever to verify the Beale Papers as legitimate story of a buried treasure. Second you have not proven if a Thomas J. Beale exist or any of his party. Do you have any deeds or wills or documents to verify any of these 31 men missing or their loved ones or any newspaper saying they were killed by Indians out on the Western Plains. No you have found no proof whatsoever. But be consoled neither has anyone else found any proof to verify the treasure story. So with no facts to back up anything, and no documents to back up anything and of course no living survivor to back up anything then the whole STORY is fictitious until you or anyone else can find any facts. Guessing or cipher codes believed to be the truth are useless unless you find and dig up the treasure, then someone may believe you.

 

[Five]

You make us out to be naysayers no matter what? You find proof of any exchange between Robert Morriss and the author of a box containing the letters and the codes, I will not only believe you, I will do my best to come and see you and shake your hand. So far you have shown no proof whatsoever to verify the Beale Papers as legitimate story of a buried treasure. Second you have not proven if a Thomas J. Beale exist or any of his party. Do you have any deeds or wills or documents to verify any of these 31 men missing or their loved ones or any newspaper saying they were killed by Indians out on the Western Plains. No you have found no proof whatsoever. But be consoled neither has anyone else found any proof to verify the treasure story. So with no facts to back up anything, and no documents to back up anything and of course no living survivor to back up anything then the whole STORY is fictitious until you or anyone else can find any facts. Guessing or cipher codes believed to be the truth are useless unless you find and dig up the treasure, then someone may believe you.

Problem occurred, you can not provide proof it is fictional either!

What you banking on, Scoop's three page conspiracy theory?

 

[franklin]

No proof is needed of a fictional story, it verifies itself when no proof can be found to verify the story.

 

[bigscoop]

Problem occurred, you can not provide proof it is fictional either!

What you banking on, Scoop's three page conspiracy theory?

Uh, actually, it's already been undeniably proven that the story isn't a true accounting. That has been clearly established by not only cold hard facts, but also by the many changes in that narration that true believers like yourself keep employing, all of this further establishing that the story isn't a true accounting. "Excuses aren't facts, they are excuses put forth in failed attempts at trying to justify the absence of facts." Eventually you will learn all of this.

 

[Five]

Uh, actually, it's already been undeniably proven that the story isn't a true accounting. That has been clearly established by not only cold hard facts, but also by the many changes in that narration that true believers like yourself keep employing, all of this further establishing that the story isn't a true accounting. "Excuses aren't facts, they are excuses put forth in failed attempts at trying to justify the absence of facts." Eventually you will learn all of this.

You have done that?

Was that James Gillogly or Joe Nickell?

Or would that be your three page nut shell game?

Not seeing any person anywhere with proof of the Beale Papers being a hoax. They say!
"probably a hoax, but no one knows for sure"

There are a few that won't put there reputation on the line at all!
There are a few that have failed to decipher the pages, so it must be the ciphers, not the person working them right? Just like in the video's on YouTube!