the Sr. San Miguel ---1715 fleet ship---information about it--check it out

[ivan salis]

(1) letter dated Oct 24,1715-- in the letter (dated about 3 months after the july 30, 1715 shipwrecks) it was stated by the english governor of virgina ( spotswood) to secretary (stanhope) "the spanish fleet rich laden, consisting of eleven sail, except for one, are likely cast away in the gulf of florida to the southward of st augustine...(later on in the letter) ...a considerable quantity of plate is likewise cast away about 40 miles to the northward of st. augustine (that would place it at the nassau sound part of amelia island) ...
(2)Sept 20,1715 --salmon wrote to king phillip stating "the 2 galleons are missing the San Miguel and the french prize ,there is little doubt they sank upon the high seas, and this was proven by because fragments of a ship or ships was found on the north coast of st augustine ( **should be read-- coast north of st augustine to matchup) --
(3). Oct 19,1715 Lima wrote to Linares (viceroy of mexico)"from the news we recieved from st augustine we learned that fragments of a large ship came ashore 15 leagues to the leeward of this port,and because of the many reefs outside this portion of the coast ,we fear there are no survivors" (**if leeward was north the 15 leauges would match up)
(4) important note " all the ships were lost except a french nao and three frigates of Echeverz squardon, because by the time the storm struck they had taken another route**(they were farther north than the rest--Haskins) the day before the storm the San Miguel had seperated from the convoy two days before the grifon had seperated and the day of the storm the fragata Concepcion seperated (Haskins--Indiferente General 2648)
I find odd use of the word the word "Galleon" (2) is used not nao ---as "galleon" normally refers to a treasure ship---also worth note is the fact that the admerial Echeverz's son was in charge of this vessel and it was recorded that it carried a large amount of tabacco ---a very high value cargo and was well armed with 22 cannon and 4 swivel guns.
(5) there is a Nov. 1769 map by the british map maker---capt william fuller showing a wreck in nassau sound (the wreck MUST pre date Nov 1769) --the english would have know of the wreck site because of the report to the governor spotswood in 1715.
with these facts in hand I feel quite strongly that the sr. san miguel final resting place is at nassau sound islet area.. how about you?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[capt_t]

Ivan, why didnt you put this in the shipwrecks forum? I believe your right on the san miguel, I was reading somewhere (I'll see if i can find it) that it sank 20 leagues north of san auguestin, now called st. augustine.
capt_t

I found the article I was thinking about, believe its the same one you read....I'll post it anyway..


The following information concerning the San Miguel is referred to in the research provided by Dr. Eugene Lyon, and compiled by Jack Haskins from his own translations and those of Bob Marx, Dr. Nancy Farris, J.M. Rodriquez, and Lou Ullian, and is the best available collective source at this time on the fate of this vessel.

There were apparently two vessels sailing with the Echeverz Squadron in the Tierra Firme Fleet, sometimes called the “Galleones”. The first, a larger of the two San Miguels, sailed with Echeverz from Spain and was a “registered ship” having special permission for lading by merchants from Havana (Lyon, letter 4/94).

This San Miguel was a Vizcayan built frigate (or Buque de Aarqueo which is the rated cargo capacity of the ship – Haskins) of 180¾ tons with 22 cannon: 18 four-pounders and 4 two pound swivel guns. Her beam was 22.5’ (12 codos), keel length of 77’ (39 codos), and overall length at the “dead rises” of 83’ (44 codos). Her master was either Joseph Coyo de Melo (Lyon), or Alonso de Figueros (Haskins, translations from the Casa files). She was owned by Antonio de Echeverz.

The San Miguel’s manifest listed 62 persons on board when she left Spain (Haskins, LM11-1). There were also 62 persons on board when she went down including de Melo, Don Domingo and Tomas Moynos, citizens of Cadiz, Don Joseph Tamorlan, Guardian Jacome de Nobleria, Piolt Alonso de Silvestre and Quartermaster Domingo de Yguzquiza, plus 22 sailors, 24 grommets, and four pages (Lyon).

According to reports, she carried tobacco from Havana (Lyon). A letter from the Case de Contratacion states, it would delay Echeverz if he were to pick up 1,500,000 pounds of tobacco, so Echeverz is sending a Patache or other ship directly to Havana (from Spain to Puerto Rico then to Havana) to pick up the tobacco, and this will be a ship of 30 guns. This was probably the San Miguel (Haskins, Indiferente General 2658). There was no cargo listed on her manifest (Haskins, LM11-5), although she was sent to pick up the tobacco in Havana, and “probably had little registered treasure on board, and may be located 1½ miles off Mayport, FL” (Haskins).

According to reports, she carried tobacco from Havana (Lyon). A letter from the Case de Contratacion states, it would delay Echeverz if he were to pick up 1,500,000 pounds of tobacco, so Echeverz is sending a Patache or other ship directly to Havana (from Spain to Puerto Rico then to Havana) to pick up the tobacco, and this will be a ship of 30 guns. This was probably the San Miguel (Haskins, Indiferente General 2658). There was no cargo listed on her manifest (Haskins, LM11-5), although she was sent to pick up the tobacco in Havana, and “probably had little registered treasure on board, and may be located 1½ miles off Mayport, FL” (Haskins).

The San Miguel sailed with the rest of the Flota of 12 ships (Marx, IPO, p. 3) from Havana Harbor on July 24, 1715. There were 5 ships of Ubilla’s New Spain Flota, 6 ships in the Echeverz Squadron of Tiera Firme, and a French Ship, the Grifon, commanded by Captain Antonio Diare. The Grifon was not part of the Flota but was leaving at the same time, having received permission to sail with the Flota (Marx). “Possibly, but Diare loaded his vessel in Vera Cruz harbor, and it seems likely that he made the Gulf crossing with Ubilla” (Haskins). There is a possibility of 7 ships sailing with Echeverz from Cartagena, to make a total of 13 ships sailing from Havana (Haskins).

The total treasure registered on four of Ubilla’s ships, excluding silverware, jewelry, and a small number of gold coins, was 6,388,020 pesos. The total carried on three of Echeverz’ Squadron was 98,046 pesos in silver and gold specie, plus 955 castellanos in gold dust and bars, for a total registered cargo of 6,486,000 pesos, 955 castellanos. Spanish reports of the period indicate that 5,200,000 pesos were recovered by them by July, 1716.

The Flota was struck by a hurricane July 30, 1715, and “The number of ships lost are nine, and the two galleons missing (Echeverz) . . . there’s little doubt that they sunk on the high seas and this was proven because fragments of a ship or ships were found on the north coast of St. Augustine . . .” (Haskins, 2.20 Sept. 1715 – Salmon to the King).

“All the ships were lost except a French nao and three frigates of Echeverz Squadron, because by the time the storm struck they had taken another route (they were further north than the rest)” (Haskins, LM11-40). The day before the storm the San Miguel separated from the convoy; two days before the storm the Grifon separated; and on the day of the storm the fragata Concepcion separated (Haskins, Indiferente General 2648).

Governor Spotswood of Virginia wrote to Secretary Stanhope on October 24, 1715 stating, “the Spanish Fleet richly laden, consisting of eleven sail are, except for one, likely cast away in the Gulf of Florida to the southward of St. Augustine . . . a considerable quantity of plate is likewise cast away about 40 miles to the northward of St. Augustine . . .” (Calendar of State Papers, Colonial Series, America & West Indies).

Salmon wrote to King Phillip that “the two galleons are missing. The San Miguel and the French Prize. There is little doubt they sank on the high seas, and this was proven because fragments of a ship or ships were found on the north coast of St. Augustine” (September 20, 1715).

There is a good possibility that the San Miguel was the ship that wrecked north of St. Augustine (Duro, Armada Espanola, Vol. VI, pp. 121).

On October 19, 1715 Lima wrote to Linares (Virrey de Mexico), “but from the news we received from St. Augustine, we learned that fragments of a large ship came ashore 15 leagues (about 50 miles or so – JH) to the leeward (north or south – JP) of this port, and because there are many reefs outside this portion of the coast, we fear there are no survivors from that wreck”. “This wreck might be either the San Miguel or the French Prize (Haskins, LM11-6).

From Bob Marx: The San Miguel had no cargo of any kind listed. Echeverz captured this ship from the English and she may have sailed back empty. Haskins writes: I think Bob has this mixed up with the schnooner Echeverz sold Ubilla in Havana (Haskins, LM11-5

 

[sanmig1715]

Ivan, why didnt you put this in the shipwrecks forum? I believe your right on the san miguel, I was reading somewhere (I'll see if i can find it) that it sank 20 leagues north of san auguestin, now called st. augustine.
capt_t

I found the article I was thinking about, believe its the same one you read....I'll post it anyway..


The following information concerning the San Miguel is referred to in the research provided by Dr. Eugene Lyon, and compiled by Jack Haskins from his own translations and those of Bob Marx, Dr. Nancy Farris, J.M. Rodriquez, and Lou Ullian, and is the best available collective source at this time on the fate of this vessel.

There were apparently two vessels sailing with the Echeverz Squadron in the Tierra Firme Fleet, sometimes called the “Galleones”. The first, a larger of the two San Miguels, sailed with Echeverz from Spain and was a “registered ship” having special permission for lading by merchants from Havana (Lyon, letter 4/94).

This San Miguel was a Vizcayan built frigate (or Buque de Aarqueo which is the rated cargo capacity of the ship – Haskins) of 180¾ tons with 22 cannon: 18 four-pounders and 4 two pound swivel guns. Her beam was 22.5’ (12 codos), keel length of 77’ (39 codos), and overall length at the “dead rises” of 83’ (44 codos). Her master was either Joseph Coyo de Melo (Lyon), or Alonso de Figueros (Haskins, translations from the Casa files). She was owned by Antonio de Echeverz.

The San Miguel’s manifest listed 62 persons on board when she left Spain (Haskins, LM11-1). There were also 62 persons on board when she went down including de Melo, Don Domingo and Tomas Moynos, citizens of Cadiz, Don Joseph Tamorlan, Guardian Jacome de Nobleria, Piolt Alonso de Silvestre and Quartermaster Domingo de Yguzquiza, plus 22 sailors, 24 grommets, and four pages (Lyon).

According to reports, she carried tobacco from Havana (Lyon). A letter from the Case de Contratacion states, it would delay Echeverz if he were to pick up 1,500,000 pounds of tobacco, so Echeverz is sending a Patache or other ship directly to Havana (from Spain to Puerto Rico then to Havana) to pick up the tobacco, and this will be a ship of 30 guns. This was probably the San Miguel (Haskins, Indiferente General 2658). There was no cargo listed on her manifest (Haskins, LM11-5), although she was sent to pick up the tobacco in Havana, and “probably had little registered treasure on board, and may be located 1½ miles off Mayport, FL” (Haskins).

According to reports, she carried tobacco from Havana (Lyon). A letter from the Case de Contratacion states, it would delay Echeverz if he were to pick up 1,500,000 pounds of tobacco, so Echeverz is sending a Patache or other ship directly to Havana (from Spain to Puerto Rico then to Havana) to pick up the tobacco, and this will be a ship of 30 guns. This was probably the San Miguel (Haskins, Indiferente General 2658). There was no cargo listed on her manifest (Haskins, LM11-5), although she was sent to pick up the tobacco in Havana, and “probably had little registered treasure on board, and may be located 1½ miles off Mayport, FL” (Haskins).

The San Miguel sailed with the rest of the Flota of 12 ships (Marx, IPO, p. 3) from Havana Harbor on July 24, 1715. There were 5 ships of Ubilla’s New Spain Flota, 6 ships in the Echeverz Squadron of Tiera Firme, and a French Ship, the Grifon, commanded by Captain Antonio Diare. The Grifon was not part of the Flota but was leaving at the same time, having received permission to sail with the Flota (Marx). “Possibly, but Diare loaded his vessel in Vera Cruz harbor, and it seems likely that he made the Gulf crossing with Ubilla” (Haskins). There is a possibility of 7 ships sailing with Echeverz from Cartagena, to make a total of 13 ships sailing from Havana (Haskins).

The total treasure registered on four of Ubilla’s ships, excluding silverware, jewelry, and a small number of gold coins, was 6,388,020 pesos. The total carried on three of Echeverz’ Squadron was 98,046 pesos in silver and gold specie, plus 955 castellanos in gold dust and bars, for a total registered cargo of 6,486,000 pesos, 955 castellanos. Spanish reports of the period indicate that 5,200,000 pesos were recovered by them by July, 1716.

The Flota was struck by a hurricane July 30, 1715, and “The number of ships lost are nine, and the two galleons missing (Echeverz) . . . there’s little doubt that they sunk on the high seas and this was proven because fragments of a ship or ships were found on the north coast of St. Augustine . . .” (Haskins, 2.20 Sept. 1715 – Salmon to the King).

“All the ships were lost except a French nao and three frigates of Echeverz Squadron, because by the time the storm struck they had taken another route (they were further north than the rest)” (Haskins, LM11-40). The day before the storm the San Miguel separated from the convoy; two days before the storm the Grifon separated; and on the day of the storm the fragata Concepcion separated (Haskins, Indiferente General 2648).

Governor Spotswood of Virginia wrote to Secretary Stanhope on October 24, 1715 stating, “the Spanish Fleet richly laden, consisting of eleven sail are, except for one, likely cast away in the Gulf of Florida to the southward of St. Augustine . . . a considerable quantity of plate is likewise cast away about 40 miles to the northward of St. Augustine . . .” (Calendar of State Papers, Colonial Series, America & West Indies).

Salmon wrote to King Phillip that “the two galleons are missing. The San Miguel and the French Prize. There is little doubt they sank on the high seas, and this was proven because fragments of a ship or ships were found on the north coast of St. Augustine” (September 20, 1715).

There is a good possibility that the San Miguel was the ship that wrecked north of St. Augustine (Duro, Armada Espanola, Vol. VI, pp. 121).

On October 19, 1715 Lima wrote to Linares (Virrey de Mexico), “but from the news we received from St. Augustine, we learned that fragments of a large ship came ashore 15 leagues (about 50 miles or so – JH) to the leeward (north or south – JP) of this port, and because there are many reefs outside this portion of the coast, we fear there are no survivors from that wreck”. “This wreck might be either the San Miguel or the French Prize (Haskins, LM11-6).

From Bob Marx: The San Miguel had no cargo of any kind listed. Echeverz captured this ship from the English and she may have sailed back empty. Haskins writes: I think Bob has this mixed up with the schnooner Echeverz sold Ubilla in Havana (Haskins, LM11-5

I've participated and leased Northeast Florida and found 300 year old virgin shipwreck in 15 feet water.

 

[ARC]

I've participated and leased Northeast Florida and found 300 year old virgin shipwreck in 15 feet water.

And what would be your reasons (clues) for deducing / conclusion / theory as to the age / type of wreck ?

 

[sanmig1715]

And what would be your reasons (clues) for deducing / conclusion / theory as to the age / type of wreck ?

Based on artifacts such as dead eyes, preserved Timbers, length /width of the top deck and Seville archives I believe it's the San Miguel. There is another shipwreck in approximately 20 ft. of water 3 miles due South that is approximately 180 ft. X 30 ft. Which makes sense and might be the second missing ship the El Ciervo. They left 2 days/1day prior to hurricane hitting the fleet at the cape. The entire scatter pattern is within 1,200 ft. We have a 60x20 intact ballast pile with timber and decking. 900 ft due South it appears to be second deck that sheared off and directly in-shore 200 ft from second deck is the top deck dismasted. I will share photos. Attached is an image of top deck that I 900 ft SW of ballast pile. The top deck runs north and south.

 

[sanmig1715]

Based on artifacts such as dead eyes, preserved Timbers, length /width of the top deck and Seville archives I believe it's the San Miguel. There is another shipwreck in approximately 20 ft. of water 3 miles due South that is approximately 180 ft. X 30 ft. Which makes sense and might be the second missing ship the El Ciervo. They left 2 days/1day prior to hurricane hitting the fleet at the cape. The entire scatter pattern is within 1,200 ft. We have a 60x20 intact ballast pile with timber and decking. 900 ft due South it appears to be second deck that sheared off and directly in-shore 200 ft from second deck is the top deck dismasted. I will share photos. Attached is an image of top deck that I 900 ft SW of ballast pile. The top deck runs north and south.

I have additional photos of large timber w/trunnels. Drop a pin 📍 on St. Augustine beach and go 39 miles due North it's not Amelia. Amelia (Nassau Sound) is 39 miles from St. Augustine inlet.

Based on artifacts such as dead eyes, preserved Timbers, length /width of the top deck and Seville archives I believe it's the San Miguel. There is another shipwreck in approximately 20 ft. of water 3 miles due South that is approximately 180 ft. X 30 ft. Which makes sense and might be the second missing ship the El Ciervo. They left 2 days/1day prior to hurricane hitting the fleet at the cape. The entire scatter pattern is within 1,200 ft. We have a 60x20 intact ballast pile with timber and decking. 900 ft due South it appears to be second deck that sheared off and directly in-shore 200 ft from second deck is the top deck dismasted. I will share photos. Attached is an image of top deck that I 900 ft SW of ballast pile. The top deck runs north and south.

drop a pin 📍 on St. Augustine beach and go 39 miles due North. It's not the Nassau Sound... Nassau Sound is approximately 39 miles from St. Augustine inlet not beaches of St. Augustine...

 

[ARC]

Based on artifacts such as dead eyes, preserved Timbers, length /width of the top deck and Seville archives I believe it's the San Miguel. There is another shipwreck in approximately 20 ft. of water 3 miles due South that is approximately 180 ft. X 30 ft. Which makes sense and might be the second missing ship the El Ciervo. They left 2 days/1day prior to hurricane hitting the fleet at the cape. The entire scatter pattern is within 1,200 ft. We have a 60x20 intact ballast pile with timber and decking. 900 ft due South it appears to be second deck that sheared off and directly in-shore 200 ft from second deck is the top deck dismasted. I will share photos. Attached is an image of top deck that I 900 ft SW of ballast pile. The top deck runs north and south.

I will say this...
You... at the very least here... have my attention.

 

[sanmig1715]

I will say this...
You... at the very least here... have my attention.

If you would like to chat call or text me at 904-518-0473 I am interested in finishing the project. I am not trying to raise capital or find investors, but potentially a partner that has the same passion as I do regarding this subject. Worse case we can share war stories regarding our adventures.

 

[: Michael-Robert.]

Any more pics and/or artifacts?

 

[sanmig1715]

I will say this...
You... at the very least here... have my attention

Any more pics and/or artifacts?

 

[ARC]

Like whoa... holy crap... UM... for the first time here... i am ALMOST speechless...
i don't know where to start...
You have definitely found a wreck... and not just a wreck... but my level of attention is now pegged.

First...... heh...... you not only found a serious wreck but it appears via these pictures that you have
removed items... which leads me to the second question....
Second.... you said you have participated in lease... So.... are you a permit holder ?

 

[sanmig1715]

Like whoa... holy crap... UM... for the first time here... i am ALMOST speechless...
i don't know where to start...
You have definitely found a wreck... and not just a wreck... but my level of attention is now pegged.

First...... heh...... you not only found a serious wreck but it appears via these pictures that you have
removed items... which leads me to the second question....
Second.... you said you have participated in lease... So.... are you a permit holder ?

GM. Yes I am but we put it on the back burner and I need to check with state to confirm lease date. I will pull my information/permit today as well. Give me a call or drop me text. Would like to get your thoughts.

 

[: Michael-Robert.]

This is a BANNER Find.

 

[FLORIDA KEYS PIRATE]

Very cool stuff. Good Luck !

 

[Linesider]

Sheiiiii nice…. Might Have to go detect that beach area Now.. point me in right direction. Bags packed n ready

 

[sanmig1715]

GM. Yes I am but we put it on the back burner and I need to check with state to confirm lease date. I will pull my information/permit today as well. Give me a call or drop me text. Would like to get your thoughts.

Do you guys have any additional information on NE Fl wrecks and/or the Coffman atlas? I know of a couple 1731 and 1711 Spanish ship wrecks near St. Mateo

 

[Digger RJ]

View attachment 2146539View attachment 2146540View attachment 2146552View attachment 2146542

Very Cool!!! Congrats!!!