cornelis 816
Sr. Member
- #1
Thread Owner
Reading the story of padre Diego and starting at the point where he was holding on to a hatch cover we may assume that this hatch cover came from the mid section or forward section of the Maravillas . This is confirmed by his remark that he saw the stern-castle of the Maravillas , all three decks of it , crash in a tumbling fall astern to starboard . Lateron he saw in the distance the silhouette of part of the bow and foremast still protruding above the surface of the ocean . No mention of the sterncastle ! Now let us go back to the ship ,, Jesus Maria y Josef ,, under command of Don Juan de Hoyos . This ship hit a rock and lost her rudder. She anchored in less thanfour and a half fathoms of water . When daylight came they saw part of the almirantas wooden foremast sticking out of the water , less than a gunshot away . When people in the water signalled for help they launched a longboat to help them . So now we may assume that the prow section of the Maravilla stayed above water long enough to safe some of the people clinging to her . This section of the Maravilla was quite heavy because of the ballast rocks and othe material used for ballast ( think of silver bars ) . Now let us look at the treasure trail . You can see a picture of that on page 247 of Dave Horners book ,, Ship Wreck ,, . I will try to copy it on this post later . The main give-away is the ballast pile . Now normally there is no ballast pile in a stern section of a ship . The hold is the normal place for ballast , be it rocks , old cannon or silver bars . The place of sinking of the prow section was not very deep . This section was sitting on the sand . The mast was clearly in sight for some time . If the mast broke off later on it would make it easy to find the spot back because measurements taken from the ,, Jesus Maria y Josef ,, were clearly given . Water depth was sis ,,brazas,,. The hull lying just North of ,, El Mimbre,, . The bottom is clean sand . The measurements taken were , 27 1/3 degrees 27 and 20 North. A second measurement was taken and showed 27 1/6 degrees 27 and 10 North . Now the question is where is the stern castle ? The sterncastle broke away from the prowsection. This sterncastle was quite large ( three decks ) . We may assume that there was no sail on this section .The treasure was on this section of the ship ( at least the more valuable part of it ) . The weight of this treasure was not big enough to make the sterncastle sink because of the vast volume of wood in this part of the ship. Being under water for the bigger part of it , the wind had no grip on it . However the current had a great part to do with the direction this part of the ship took .My idea therefor is that the sterncastle was taken further North by the current without being influanced by the wind . The big rewards are still there for the right people to take the trouble to investigate some more . Cornelius