|
-
Jan 03, 2010, 11:40 PM
#1
-
Jan 04, 2010, 08:39 AM
#2
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
Well let me be the first to congratulate you on an outstanding season, good luck to you in the upcoming season!
-
Jan 04, 2010, 03:55 PM
#3
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
Congrats on a very fine year of detecting. Enjoyed looking at your pics. 
Good luck,
HH.
-
Jan 04, 2010, 04:33 PM
#4
-
Jan 04, 2010, 07:40 PM
#5
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
I had a hole like that, I think it was because i watched to much Hogan's Heroes.
-
Jan 05, 2010, 05:53 PM
#6
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
man you had a superb year of detecting, way to go, hope your 2010 is BETTER!!!!
-
Jan 05, 2010, 11:08 PM
#7
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
 Originally Posted by ModernMiner
Nate,
You are an amazing young man. Your Dad & Mom should be darn proud of you. Heck, I'm proud of you and we've never met.  If I had a year like you did I could hang up my detector. You & Mirage sure make a great team, and know how to find the old coins.  By the looks of that pile of coins I think you can pay for the rest of your college. 
Good luck in 2010.
-MM-
P.S. One question....Were you counting your money in the bathroom to keep your sister away from it? 
Many thanks MM. Hopefully we meet and all do a hunt before too long!
That change will pay for about 1 book. lol 
The TP roll was the closest thing handy when I was going through the coins with a cold/allergies, as the bathroom is right across from that table. 
I appreciate the responses yall!
-
Jan 05, 2010, 11:28 PM
#8
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
Excellent year Nate..but I gotta tell ya, I think my most favorite is that lil snake ring, dont know why, as I am scared to death of snakes, but that is one super nice lil ring.
Live your life in such a way, that when your feet hit the floor in the morning, satan shudders and says, OH CHIT, SHE'S AWAKE.
-
Jan 06, 2010, 09:29 AM
#9
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
Nate that is one great job you did in 2009. Congrats
-
Jan 12, 2010, 07:29 PM
#10
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
Very awsome year. Good luck in college.
HH in 2010
-
Jan 16, 2010, 06:38 PM
#11
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-w
Piles! I like piles.
You're not thinking of one key point when you doubt you'll be able to top it. That is, it only takes one great find to put someone from an average year to a very good year. If someone were to tell me how few early military buttons I was going to dig in 2009 I would have been quite sure it would have been a disaster. But, what I would have had no way to know was I'd dig a very rare token and many other interesting finds. My best detecting year was 2001, but just the one one find made 2009 one of my better ones since.
AMERICAN DIGGERS ON SPIKE: THE TRASH WE WOULD LIKE TO DISCRIMINATE OUT!
-
Jan 16, 2010, 11:36 PM
#12
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-w
Thanks Bootybay, Bobbert, and Knightwalker! 
 Originally Posted by Iron Patch
Piles!  I like piles.
You're not thinking of one key point when you doubt you'll be able to top it. That is, it only takes one great find to put someone from an average year to a very good year. If someone were to tell me how few early military buttons I was going to dig in 2009 I would have been quite sure it would have been a disaster. But, what I would have had no way to know was I'd dig a very rare token and many other interesting finds. My best detecting year was 2001, but just the one one find made 2009 one of my better ones since.
That's why I threw in "quantity-wise" in the title, cause the the best part of the year, as far as finds go, was the quantity. So yea I kinda agree. But even if I did find say a gold coin one year, but didn't hunt very much and lacked in other finds, it still would be hard for me to label that year as my best, because I can't discredit all the hard work and sacrificed time that I spent a previous year with lots of energy and passion and excitement going all over the place and hunting hard, finding nothing unbelievable and whatever I could turn up. I guess the annual analysis is personal to a degree. 
And I remember that button, that's awesome man, I'm glad you got to make such a sweet find! I hope you have another enjoyable season coming up as well.
-
Jan 23, 2010, 08:38 PM
#13
 CS IS NEXT
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
What a great year for you Nate....Glad to see that you still have the passion buddy.Excellent,Excellent,Excellent.......By the way is that a 3-Ringer I see Great Dig's
-
Jan 24, 2010, 09:19 PM
#14
Re: 2009 for Nate in Ohio...best year yet and prolly won't be topped (quantity-wise)
 Originally Posted by civilman1
What a great year for you Nate....Glad to see that you still have the passion buddy.Excellent,Excellent,Excellent.......By the way is that a 3-Ringer I see  Great Dig's 
Heh, I'm not sure. Thanks civilman!!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|