- Jan 6, 2014
- 12,262
- 37,960
- Detector(s) used
-
White's prizm IV
Keene A52 with Gold Hog mats
Gold-N-Sand hand dredge
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- Thread starter
- #481
I read all of them completely through buddy (twice) before I responded to you.... I think somebody has "stolen" the terminology of bow torque. I admit maybe today I'm totally wrong. Maybe it is a MAJOR breakthrough and I hope so if it helps all archers.
But this I do know... a bow and arrow and a rifle will never have their aiming techniques confused or compared to each other. It's like apples and oranges. On a bow the further you separate two required aiming alignments the greater the aim required to align... and then skill demo's the execution of this aim. Same on a gun scope.
Who would you bet on between a professional target archer and you at just 60 ft. with a .22 at the same target? Just curious
I get what you are saying. The ability to see the bow "torque" is the placement of the sights, one in front of the riser, one behind. You move much it shows up instantly in the sights. I forgot to mention, you can shoot without using your dominate eye... a problem I have or will have. They have a sight called the compound bow rifle sight that can be adjusted so a right handed shooter can use his left eye.
As you said above...
"On a bow the further you separate two required aiming alignments the greater the aim required to align"
Now wait a minute... the peep and the pins are 30+ inches from each other, the hind sight 5-7 inches apart. (front to rear) am I missing something? or just not understanding what you are saying?
I have a test kit, various target tip weights on the way. Test and tune to get that "paradox"
OK I weighed my arrows 450 grain without a tip. Heavy.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: