Tom Dankowski and the Fisher CZ-3D .....

[Willee]

I have been doing some reading about the Fisher CZ-3D.
Tom Dankowski had written a Fisher Intelligence Report (5th edition) that is very interesting.
I cant see how anyone that reads that document would not be compelled to get there hands on a CZ-3D and give it a try.
He seems to have done extensive field work during the development of that detector and what he says makes a lot of sense.
It is one of the few CZ series detectors that Fisher still makes and I dont know how much longer they will be available.

I have been using one for about two weeks and I think this one will never leave my core arsenal of machines.
If I were more of a coin hunter ... this would be my choice for the older home sites.

Would like to hear opinions from others that have used the CZ-3D as a coin hunter (preferably at older sites) and/or read Tom's articles.

Willee

[mikefromIllinois]

Hi Willee Have been metal detecting going on 39yrs, and purchased a cz-3d three years ago. Its the best metal detector I have owned for my type of hunting. I hunt mostly the old forgoten fair grounds, chautauqua sites, and campmeeting sites. I have pulled over 100 pre 1900s from 3 sites. I really like how it brings the older indians, half dimes, and older nickels into the hightone. For coin hunting and finding the older coins I think its one of the better machines.

[therover]

I have nothing but good thing to say about CZ's as they are my favorite detector. Tom D is a wealth of info and his site is great.

Keep that CZ3D Willie...it is one of the best all around units on the planet as long as it is tuned to Tom D's specs ( ie. air test depth on clad dime 10+ inches). It can hunt in trash with the smaller coil, hunt old sites with the 8 inch, hunt the beaches with the 8 or 10.5 inch coils.

The only downside I found was you really can't utilize the Enhanced mode in the modern parks due to it bringing some of the aluminum trash hitting as high tones.

CZ's, to me, are one of the easiest, deepest units and the 3 or 4 tones are very easy to distinguish and when you get that sweet, mellow repeatable high tone, it's music to your ears.

[mrwilburino]

I noticed you've had both the Etrac and the V3, Willie. How do you think the CZ-3D compares with those two for depth and hunting in trashy areas?

[Willee]

I noticed you've had both the Etrac and the V3, Willie. How do you think the CZ-3D compares with those two for depth and hunting in trashy areas?

I haven't used them long enough to get a good opinion yet.
But so far I think the CZ-3D is a darn good choice for hunting coins and is just as deep as the E-trac. (considering coil size)
The CZ-3D has a 8" coil (my favorite is the 5") and the E-Trac pro coil is 10" giving the E-trac a depth edge.
The CZ-3D seems to be more sensitive to small silver and gold items.
With the CZ-3D looking for coins in the dirt, I would dig all high tones regardless of what the meter says.
On the beach for coins and jewelry, dig all the mid and high tones.

Cant say much about the White's V3 yet as I have only coin hunted for about 2 hours with it but I suspect I might favor it over the E-trac for coin hunting.
I like the pinpoint screen showing the three frequency's as it does reveal steel bottle caps.

Willee

[mrwilburino]

Thanks Willee.
I use the five inch coil quite a bit myself. I’ve had my 3D since July. It’s a great machine, but can be a real handful in the rusty nail infested areas where I hunt. While the 3D does give you good, accurate audio information to work with, it still can take time away from the hunt when you have to stop and analyze all of those high tone / iron bounces. Been thinking about either getting another mid priced detector to deal with the iron infested spots, or maybe something more high-end to see if I can also squeeze a little more depth and target separation out of some of my sites.