Any help would be appreciated. Including whether or not I need better pictures. Thank you!
G Giangiul Greenie Jun 10, 2014 18 23 Michigan Primary Interest: All Treasure Hunting Oct 12, 2020 #1 Any help would be appreciated. Including whether or not I need better pictures. Thank you! Amazon Forum Fav 👍 How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon! Last edited: Oct 14, 2020
Any help would be appreciated. Including whether or not I need better pictures. Thank you! Amazon Forum Fav 👍 How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!
Charlie P. (NY) Gold Member Feb 3, 2006 13,004 17,108 South Central Upstate NY in the foothills of the h Detector(s) used Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone Primary Interest: Metal Detecting Oct 14, 2020 #2 I don't see fossil. Looks more like quartz that formed in a fractured stone matrix.
P Planko Jr. Member Oct 2, 2020 29 37 Primary Interest: All Treasure Hunting Oct 15, 2020 #3 I am in the same position. Very cool looking but not a fossil
OP OP G Giangiul Greenie Jun 10, 2014 18 23 Michigan Primary Interest: All Treasure Hunting Oct 15, 2020 Thread starter #4 Thank you for taking the time to answer. I appreciate the help. I'll keep looking.
ArfieBoy Silver Member Aug 11, 2011 3,418 5,683 N.E. Oregon Detector(s) used Compass X-70, Compass X-80, Compass X-90, Compass Judge 2, Garrett AT Pro Primary Interest: All Treasure Hunting Oct 15, 2020 #5 I'm not sure it is a fossil, but picture No. 3 definitely looks like interior bone structure. Thanks for posting.
I'm not sure it is a fossil, but picture No. 3 definitely looks like interior bone structure. Thanks for posting.