image #1 and the last one those flakes that came off in the center is very different
is there any one out there that knows why?
please don't misunderstand me i am not questioning the piece...........just sayin' that's all
Now this is just my opinion but from what I see.. It was chipped into shape and put to use rather quickly after giving it a bit edge... and most of the polish especially towards the bit is from use.
I wouldn't call this a ground stone celt... rather a chipped one
I think it is a thumb/finger hold Larson. I have a couple of cores of this material at the cabin rock garden. I think these artifacts are made of the same material. That celt has a lot of polish/use.
That's a nice celt and JMO that the polish looks like they where going to make a polished celt. The reason I say that is there is polish toward the end and middle and not any hammer marks on the end. There should be hammer marks to have that much polish form wear. I may be wrong, but it is a real fine celt