Paleo Flake Core

[uniface]

The only factor that identifies this as being from the Paleoindian era is the fact that it was found on a single-component fluted point site in Coshocton County, Ohio that was a reduction site as well as a habitation site. ex Alan Harbuck.

Three substantial flakes were removed from it, as you can see. As is usually the case with flake cores, the thin edge was suited to cutting tasks and was so used, with some re-edging as use progressed.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges - Grab it through Amazon!

[eyemustdigtreasure]

Nice one!
Looks like the core was re-touched to be used as a tool..., in butchering perhaps....
why not? Its a perfect fit for a fist...!

 

[uniface]

May well have been.

But if you're skinning/cutting meat, razor blade flakes (or blades) do better with less effort. Heavier/stouter edges for heavier/stouter tasks.

 

[ToddsPoint]

May well have been.

But if you're skinning/cutting meat, razor blade flakes (or blades) do better with less effort. Heavier/stouter edges for heavier/stouter tasks.

I've found that using razor blade flakes for skinning is a non-starter. The sharp flakes cut through the hide and ruin it. Fine if you don't want to keep the hide. If you plan on keeping the hide, a nice flat blade that is beveled like a Thebes is the best. Razor flakes are for dismembering the parts but not for skinning, IMHO. Gary

 

[Tony in SC]

I haven't seen this discussed before but Gary is right. A thicker tool is better for removing a hide because of the angle of the cut, but then sometimes you have to use what you have.

 

[Tesorodeoro]

I haven't seen this discussed before but Gary is right. A thicker tool is better for removing a hide because of the angle of the cut, but then sometimes you have to use what you have.

Yes, a blade can definitely be too sharp for skinning.

That’s why I kind of like softer steels for skinning knives...you can easily keep the edge right where you like it as far as sharpness goes.

 

[uniface]

I said that based on skinning a bunch of rabbits over the years, and sometimes groundhogs. I pulled the edge of the skin 90 degree angled from the carcass, and used the knife blade to separate it from the muscle right where the two met. Never punctured one that I remember. Surgery -- not butchery. I'll take your words for it though, while remembering two different experimental archaeologists who reported on the absence of use wear after they'd skinned out bison with single flakes.

They didn't report, that I know of, whether they messed the hides up. FWIW

 

[ToddsPoint]

Here's the first and last critter I skinned with flakes. A beaver. You can see all the cut marks on the back from the flakes. I sewed up the cuts as best I could. The skin came out okay for display but those old Indians would be laughing at me for ruining a good hide. I did a lot of experimental archaeology in the past. That's how you really figure stuff out. Gary

 

[newnan man]

You gotta be careful with those beavers!

 

[kentucky Quinn]

Man, I keep saying I’m going to try some of my ancient tools on one of the deer I harvest, for educational purposes. Thanks for sharing