That's in really good shape, I dug an 1887 in close condition to yours but there's some decay around the edges in a few spots. The 1859 fattie (I posted it a few months ago) I found is almost all crud, but I can make out the date and some of the headdress. You did very well with this one, thanks for posting.
no matter what price list you go by, the prices are inflated and represent a price that doesn't represent the actual market value, and having said that the grade has to be 'straight grade' and certified too
the vast majority of dug coins have corrosion on of one sort or another and removing it only worsens some coins but others remarkably can be improved through proper conservation methods
when a corroded coin is viewed by collectors and buyers it is considered environmentally damaged and that distinction would also deem the coina 'details' coin and that drastically reduces the market acceptable value of a coin in the marketplace probably down to maybe 10 to 20 percent of values ..if you're lucky
It's tough with a value on dug coins when not everyone sees a coin like that as a high grade or overly desirable...there are plenty of undug examples out there
I've been disappointed about the value of some of my finds but I'm in it for the adventure not the riches
It's a good find in the way it's a semikey date and it's worth keeping mostly for posterity as a find.
IMO, it's a Jekyll and Hyde coin.....obverse is probably VG, but, maybe good enough to grade Fine, and reverse is much better at XF. Both have corrosion damage, so, price offered will reflect that. I would not pay to have it graded/slabbed. Not an easy date to find! Well done! Oh, and from what I can see, it's not an overdate.