1st ring of year-sterling w/diamond

JrMack

Full Member
Feb 16, 2014
227
179
steuben co. ny
Detector(s) used
bounty hunter, x-terra 305/505/705,discovery TF 900
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
DSC01109.JPG this is my first ring this year. Its 9.25 on inside and about a 1kt diamond I think. will have to get it checked out. Very small size though. Found 2-3 inches down in my nieces yard so we'll split the ring. also found some clad and a wheat cent 1936. Also found a geocash accidently down by the river. Great day
 

Upvote 7

jewelerguy

Gold Member
Jun 28, 2011
11,435
8,926
Oklahoma
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
White's XLT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
nice silver! usually real diamonds aren't put in sterling, but no harm to verify.

since the price of gold shot up so high, the average person can hardly afford gold rings these days. sterling silver rings have become the norm. personally, I think silver is a horrible material for a ring because it is too soft and scratches easily as well as tarnishes. even so, lots of silver rings these days do have genuine diamonds, although they are usually small and of a very poor quality. I have no doubt that this find is a cz just based on size alone.
 

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
Staff member
Jul 27, 2006
48,475
54,930
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Most likely it is CZ like jewelerguy says or it is moissanite...
 

Last edited:
OP
OP
JrMack

JrMack

Full Member
Feb 16, 2014
227
179
steuben co. ny
Detector(s) used
bounty hunter, x-terra 305/505/705,discovery TF 900
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
thanks for replies, I have read that usually diamonds are poor quality set in silver. The ring wasn't tarnished just dirty pulled from good topsoil, I,ll post when I can get it checked out. I do believe its old though. JR
 

pl8man

Silver Member
Mar 18, 2009
4,202
4,640
San Jose , California
🥇 Banner finds
2
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
2
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT PRO with Sunray probe, M6 with a Super 12 coil & a Whites Quantum II
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Sweet ring !
 

nolanation

Full Member
Apr 28, 2014
141
527
NC
Detector(s) used
CTX 3030
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Yea should just be CZ. Cool find!
 

Oct 5, 2014
31,886
35,425
Massachusetts
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Garrett: AT Pro, AT Gold & Infinium; Minelab: Explorer SE, II; Simplex; Tesoro: Tejon & Outlaw; White's: V3i
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Very nice looking ring, I sure hope it's real...let us know. Congratulations.
 

jewelerguy

Gold Member
Jun 28, 2011
11,435
8,926
Oklahoma
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
White's XLT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I would like to offer a 'slight' retraction of the statement I made earlier on this thread. While it would be absurd to mount a larger genuine diamond in a .925 silver ring, I do on occasion see larger genuine diamonds mounted in 'platinaire', which is 95% sterling and 5% platinum. This mixture was created to sell as a 'tarnish resistant' alternative to a .925 ring. They are only slightly tougher to scratch than silver. Personally, I think they are just as equally crappy. I have seen these rings mounted with 1/5, 1/3, and even 1/2 carat diamonds. While genuine, they are usually very poor quality being very cloudy with inclusions or heavily speckled with black carbon
 

rodarian

Hero Member
Jul 20, 2014
820
483
upstate New York
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
2
Detector(s) used
AT Pro, ACE250, Garrett pro pointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Regardless the outcome of the stone, nice find!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top