Are they authentic

Adam75

Newbie
Jan 6, 2018
2
4
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • received_1801219073480035.jpeg
    received_1801219073480035.jpeg
    51.4 KB · Views: 107
  • received_1801219063480036.jpeg
    received_1801219063480036.jpeg
    71.4 KB · Views: 96
  • 15152521908621012300097.jpg
    15152521908621012300097.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 101
  • 15152522470032115858193.jpg
    15152522470032115858193.jpg
    443.7 KB · Views: 123
  • 1515252285879314685745.jpg
    1515252285879314685745.jpg
    785.4 KB · Views: 96
Welcome to TNet!!

I'm sure some of the Indian Artifact specialists will be along soon to help...
 

Upvote 0
how did you acquire them? for example, if you found them in a field or creek, then of course they're authentic. If you bought them in a souvenir shop, then the authenticity is subject to questioning. A general location of the find can be helpful too in case someone here knows or can find out if other similar artifacts have been found in the area. It's very important for anyone coming here seeking answers to provide as much information as possible.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
I can't tell, but the hole in the banner stone should not be perfectly round.
 

Upvote 0
A answer to your question the stone grove ax head I found at Buffalo point In northern Arkansas we floted the Buffalo ! Spring, white,rivers every year as a family vacation of the stone ax head I bought it with a small lot of artifacts at the yearly auction for the ms foundation. It is the only piece I have been stumped to find out more about it.
 

Upvote 0
The diameter of the hole is smaller than your fingertips, and that means only a VERY narrow wooden shaft would fit into it... which (in view of the size/weight of the stone) means the wood shaft would be too weak to withstand striking-force without breaking. Imagine trying to whack on something using a modern hammer which had a 3/8th-inch diameter wood handle. I wouldn't want to depend on something that would almost certainly break the first time I used if "forcefully." If I'm wrong about the importance of the shaft-hole's extremely small size in authenticating the object, somebody please educate me.
 

Upvote 0
The diameter of the hole is smaller than your fingertips, and that means only a VERY narrow wooden shaft would fit into it... which (in view of the size/weight of the stone) means the wood shaft would be too weak to withstand striking-force without breaking. Imagine trying to whack on something using a modern hammer which had a 3/8th-inch diameter wood handle. I wouldn't want to depend on something that would almost certainly break the first time I used if "forcefully." If I'm wrong about the importance of the shaft-hole's extremely small size in authenticating the object, somebody please educate me.

It seems that the use or function of them is still debated. The wiki page on them has some pretty decent information. I would imagine that they were very hard to make and very time consuming, so I personally lean more towards them being more of a ceremonial object https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bannerstone
 

Upvote 0
Reading the info at the Links y'all provided, I see my analysis about the hole's diameter is irrelevant for authenticating the object. My studies on Native American artifacts in college was almost 50 years ago, and it seems I've forgotten more than a little of what I learned at that time. [sigh]

Although to me its thick-bodied sides and their shape resemble a double-headed war club rather than a bannerstone, it would be classified as one, and a bannerstone is not a "battering" device... so the wooden shaft it gets mounted on can be thin. The hole being so narrow would also seem to exclude it from being an atlatl weight.

Adam75, I estimated 3/8th-inch, but for my curiosity please measure and tell us what is the exact diameter of the hole in your bannerstone?
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Just curios ,clean out that hole and see what that fuzzy stuff is, hope its not fiberglass. lots of replicas floating around out there. not saying you have one .
 

Upvote 0
Just curios ,clean out that hole and see what that fuzzy stuff is, hope its not fiberglass. lots of replicas floating around out there. not saying you have one .

I was going to mention the same thing. Enlarging the photo it appears that the hole has remnants of fiberglass as if the hole had been enlarged with a round drill bit. Indicating this is maybe, a fiber cast product. Also the groove cut around the outside of the axe (second pict.) looks too smooth, and perfect.
 

Upvote 0
That object appears to be a banner stone, not an axe so it wouldn't need a big hole for that.
The diameter of the hole is smaller than your fingertips, and that means only a VERY narrow wooden shaft would fit into it... which (in view of the size/weight of the stone) means the wood shaft would be too weak to withstand striking-force without breaking. Imagine trying to whack on something using a modern hammer which had a 3/8th-inch diameter wood handle. I wouldn't want to depend on something that would almost certainly break the first time I used if "forcefully." If I'm wrong about the importance of the shaft-hole's extremely small size in authenticating the object, somebody please educate me.
 

Upvote 0
It is a Bannerstone ! Great find and rare! Used on Atlatl ! How did you acquire it?
 

Upvote 0
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top