BP or BC or 'calendar years' huh?

redbeardrelics

Hero Member
Jan 3, 2014
891
1,019
Maryland's Eastern Shore
Detector(s) used
Garrett GTI 2500, (Ace 250 spare)
Primary Interest:
Other
Good question.... I think what it may come down to is that over time the "radiocarbon dates" recorded for many items did not match up well with other dating methods, such as determined with tree rings, ice cores, etc., and so to adjust for that, and to make typical radiocarbon dates more accurate and meaningful, they are now analyzed or decoded against the known discrepancies. I think what is happening is that say for example the Kanawha type point mentioned above from the St. Albans site was dated at approximately 7100 BC (aka. "calendar years", or 9050 BP.). They came up with figure I suspect by decoding the 6210 =/- 100BC "radiocarbon date", and determining that "radiocarbon dates" of 6210 BC really mean the object dates to about 7100BC. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
 

Charl

Silver Member
Jan 19, 2012
3,055
4,685
Rhode Island
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
I can offer this chart, which helps me.....

IMG_6702.JPG
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top