Doubtful. Too many pieces of this puzzle fit perfectly. Also, South St. Paul is not simply the south part of the city of St. Paul... it is a town in its own right.
If true, why wouldn't the token have S.SP instead of SP?
Doubtful. Too many pieces of this puzzle fit perfectly. Also, South St. Paul is not simply the south part of the city of St. Paul... it is a town in its own right.
Fair question. Depending on when it was issued (which we haven't yet determined), South St Paul may not have existed. I'm not sure of the date off-hand, but it was simply considered part of St Paul up to some point (also known as the village of Kaposia, but that referred more to the home of the local Dakota tribe )If true, why wouldn't the token have S.SP instead of SP?