Coil Size For Lake Hunting

Woodland Detectors

Gold Member
Nov 23, 2008
12,712
141
Toll Free ~ 855~966~3563
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
That all depends. Personally I prefer a smaller coil if the shore is littered with lead and other trash. It forces me to slow down, and really separate the targets. A smaller coil is nice to work around pilings and other structures where the large coils has difficulty maneuvering around.
 

Frankn

Gold Member
Mar 21, 2010
8,711
2,989
Maryland
Detector(s) used
XLT , surfmaster PI , HAYS 2Box , VIBRA-TECTOR
Either one would work, but the real question is what is the bottom composed of. Targets in sand will work there way down by vibration of the water where targets in mud are only covered by sediment. The recovery tool is the question mark. Frank
 

mlayers

Gold Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,576
429
Northern, OH
Detector(s) used
DFX, White PI, Bounty Hunter, Whites Surfmaster II and Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
They both will work good......Matt
 

OP
OP
CoilFisher

CoilFisher

Hero Member
Jul 17, 2011
957
251
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Thx on the replies.

I dont really see how 2.5" makes much difference, but I imagine a 10.5" would be more suited to actually diving. As you would want to cover area that has little trash reached by going down with a tank.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top