Engineers work to save pirate shipwreck

rgecy

Bronze Member
Jun 14, 2004
1,910
59
Beaufort, SC
Detector(s) used
Garrett Sea Hunter Mk II
RALEIGH, N.C. - Authorities are resorting to a risky new method aimed at helping preserve what is believed to be the sunken flagship of the pirate Blackbeard.

The Army Corps of Engineers is creating an underwater sand dune to shelter the Queen Anne's Revenge, which sits about 26 feet (8 meters) underwater off the North Carolina coast.

The untried method could potentially damage the ship, which sank in 1718. But if it works, experts said it could be a model for protecting other underwater archaeological finds.

"We don't really know what it's going to do," said Bill Adams, a biologist with the Corps.

The idea of burying the wreck in sand was suggested in the state's plan for managing the site after it was discovered in 1996.

Project archaeologist Chris Southerly said the burial was made possible because the corps was dredging near the site and had a ready supply of sand. Dredging began Wednesday.

A fresh covering?
The dumped sand will create a slope on the ocean floor that's about 600 feet (180 meters) long, 200 feet (60 meters) wide and 6 feet (2 meters) tall. Experts hope ocean currents will carry sand toward the ship, replenishing the protective covering it once had.

Archaeologists have been retrieving artifacts from the wreck for years and haven't stopped diving on the site. But exposure of cannons, anchors, and other artifacts is now at a "critical point," Southerly said.

Organic material like wood is especially at risk of rapid deterioration with the loss of the preserving cover of sand, he said.

Legend vs. reality
Blackbeard, whose real name was widely believed to be Edward Teach or Thatch, was tracked down at Ocracoke Inlet by volunteers from the Royal Navy and killed in a battle on Nov. 22, 1718.

Some scientists, including a pair of professors who published an article last year, have questioned whether the wreck is the Queen Anne's Revenge. They suggest the vessel is more likely a mid-18th-century merchant ship than a pirate's boat.

But Southerly, who's been studying the Queen Anne's Revenge since 2000, said research supports his view that the ship, discovered in 1996, belonged to Blackbeard.

"The Queen Anne's Revenge is the only candidate that fits, that is documented in Beaufort Inlet," he said.
 

Darren in NC

Silver Member
Apr 1, 2004
2,780
1,574
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Sand Shark, Homebuilt pulse loop
Primary Interest:
Shipwrecks
RGecy said:
Some scientists, including a pair of professors who published an article last year, have questioned whether the wreck is the Queen Anne's Revenge. They suggest the vessel is more likely a mid-18th-century merchant ship than a pirate's boat.

The scientists/professors had motive to discredit the wreck. They are from ECU and they were passed up for overseeing the conservation at their lab. A separate lab was built, though, on the same campus with other experts chosen to run the project. Those guys have been sore ever since :'(

Overwhelming evidence shows the wreck to be the QAR.
 

1liquigirl

Sr. Member
Jun 13, 2005
393
13
Bellefonte, PA
You're right Darren, here is a chart of the wreck off of Riverside, NC, dated 1793, with an X marking the spot. It's definitely not an 1800's wreck. ~Michelle
 

Attachments

  • Blackbeard-Queen Annes Revenge- beaufort-inlet-1738chrt.gif
    Blackbeard-Queen Annes Revenge- beaufort-inlet-1738chrt.gif
    26.3 KB · Views: 590
  • Blackbeard-Queen Annes Revenge- beaufort-inlet-1738chrt.gif
    Blackbeard-Queen Annes Revenge- beaufort-inlet-1738chrt.gif
    26.3 KB · Views: 401

SomeGuy

Hero Member
Jun 26, 2005
510
6
Darren in NC said:
RGecy said:
Some scientists, including a pair of professors who published an article last year, have questioned whether the wreck is the Queen Anne's Revenge. They suggest the vessel is more likely a mid-18th-century merchant ship than a pirate's boat.

The scientists/professors had motive to discredit the wreck. They are from ECU and they were passed up for overseeing the conservation at their lab. A separate lab was built, though, on the same campus with other experts chosen to run the project. Those guys have been sore ever since :'(

Overwhelming evidence shows the wreck to be the QAR.

So if they are incompetent or dishonest, either one would make them the wrong choice to oversee the project.
 

Darren in NC

Silver Member
Apr 1, 2004
2,780
1,574
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Sand Shark, Homebuilt pulse loop
Primary Interest:
Shipwrecks
Interesting, Liquigirl, that the X was on the original map (I assume it was). What are the anchors indicating? Anyone?
 

1liquigirl

Sr. Member
Jun 13, 2005
393
13
Bellefonte, PA
Yes Darren, the X was there. I don't know why anyone didn't search there sooner than the mid nineties. Good guess Suwanne, if they put an X on old maps to note shipwrecks, so other boats would not run into them and meet a similar fate, than anchors should mean save anchorage. Anyone know for sure on that, beyond a guess?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top